Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWLvsLGHETF Comparison
HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF (LGH) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IWL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 1% for LGH. IWL is down -1.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$27M in YTD flows. LGH performs worse with -2.31% YTD performance, and -$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWL and LGH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWL vs LGH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWL LGH | -2.12%-3.15% | -2.23%-3.24% | -1.67%-2.31% | +23.68%+24.68% | +90.64%+84.98% | +89.72%+79.44% |
| Flows | IWL LGH | -$17M- | +$52M-$3M | +$27M-$3M | +$124M+$26M | +$473M+$110M | +$428M+$244M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWL LGH | +12.13%+16.11% | +18.65%+17.89% | +15.25%+16.87% | +17.20%+16.76% |
| Max drawdown | IWL LGH | -3.91%-5.38% | -13.89%-11.27% | -19.22%-18.42% | -25.69%-29.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWL LGH | 58d57d | 45d48d | 126d206d | 707d806d |
IWL | LGH | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $165.19 | $59.21 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $167.70 | $60.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWL | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWL | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $165.19 | $59.21 |
| 1D performance | -1.50% | -2.04% |
| AuM | $2.02 B | $563.21 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 1% |
IWL | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Howard Capital Management |
| Benchmark | Russell Top 200 Index | HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 191 | 393 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2009 | October 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWL and LGH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IWL is down -1.67% year-to-date (YTD), while LGH has lost -2.31%. That puts IWL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWL or LGH?
Year-to-date, the IWL ETF saw +$27M in flows, compared to -$3M for LGH.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWL or LGH?
Over the past year, IWL had a volatility of 18.65%, while LGH experienced 17.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWL or LGH?
As of March 11, 2026, IWL holds $2.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while LGH manages $563.21 M.
What sectors do the IWL and LGH ETFs invest in?
IWL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, LGH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWL ETF and LGH ETF?
IWL top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. LGH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWL or LGH?
IWL holds 201 securities with 50.83% of its assets in the top 15. LGH has 405 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.6%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
