Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWLvsLDRXETF Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IWL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.5% for LDRX. IWL is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$27M in YTD flows. LDRX performs worse with -4.14% YTD performance, and +$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWL and LDRX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWL vs LDRX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWL LDRX | -2.03%-1.90% | -2.65%-3.66% | -3.15%-4.14% | +21.03%n/a | +87.77%n/a | +86.89%n/a |
| Flows | IWL LDRX | -$17M+$20M | +$52M+$19M | +$27M+$20M | +$138M- | +$473M- | +$428M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWL LDRX | +12.32%+11.90% | +18.71%n/a | +15.27%n/a | +17.22%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWL LDRX | -4.69%-5.24% | -13.89%n/a | -19.22%n/a | -25.69%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWL LDRX | 59d77d | 45dn/a | 126dn/a | 707dn/a |
IWL | LDRX | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $164.03 | $31.25 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $165.19 | $31.54 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWL | LDRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWL | LDRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $164.03 | $31.25 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -0.92% |
| AuM | $1.99 B | $207.43 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.5% |
IWL | LDRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Summit Global Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell Top 200 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 191 | 99 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2009 | May 2, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWL and LDRX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWL is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD), while LDRX has lost -4.14%. That puts IWL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWL or LDRX?
Year-to-date, the IWL ETF saw +$27M in flows, compared to +$20M for LDRX.
Which ETF is bigger: IWL or LDRX?
As of March 12, 2026, IWL holds $1.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while LDRX manages $207.43 M.
What sectors do the IWL and LDRX ETFs invest in?
IWL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, LDRX focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWL ETF and LDRX ETF?
IWL top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. LDRX holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWL or LDRX?
IWL holds 201 securities with 50.83% of its assets in the top 15. LDRX has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 62.92%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
