IWLvsADMEETF Comparison
VS
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. IWL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.79% for ADME. IWL is up 7.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. ADME performs worse with 7.27% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWL and ADME below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWL vs ADME performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWL ADME | +0.70%+0.32% | +3.13%+2.47% | +7.38%+7.27% | +17.21%+12.61% | +72.73%+50.36% | +82.20%+37.70% |
| Flows | IWL ADME | +$18M+$4M | +$211K+$25M | +$3M+$26M | +$105M+$28M | +$431M+$14M | +$385M+$3M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWL ADME | +13.51%+12.13% | +13.25%+10.82% | +15.55%+12.52% | +17.42%+13.21% |
| Max drawdown | IWL ADME | -4.76%-4.35% | -9.79%-7.44% | -19.22%-15.67% | -25.69%-23.72% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWL ADME | 52d52d | 92d47d | 126d160d | 707d896d |
Trading data
IWL | ADME | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $182.27 | $54.76 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $182.37 | $54.84 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ADME
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWL | ADME | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWL | ADME | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $182.27 | $54.76 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.15% |
| AuM | $2.17 B | $289.08 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
IWL | ADME | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | APTUS ETFs |
| Benchmark | Russell Top 200 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 198 | 497 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2009 | June 8, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWL
USA
97.69%
Other
2.31%
ADME
USA
96.57%
Other
3.43%
Sectors
IWL
Technology
49.96%
Finance
11.96%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.2%
Healthcare
8.44%
Industrials
7.19%
Other
13.26%
ADME
Technology
44.97%
Finance
13.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.12%
Healthcare
8.85%
Industrials
7.53%
Other
16.08%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.56%
ADME
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
IWL
NVIDIA Corp.
8.40%
Apple, Inc.
7.53%
Microsoft Corp.
4.99%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.16%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.75%
Broadcom Inc.
3.16%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.02%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.34%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.23%
Tesla, Inc.
2.21%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.72%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.70%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.68%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.57%
Intel Corp.
1.10%
ADME
NVIDIA Corp.
7.40%
Apple, Inc.
6.63%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.65%
Microsoft Corp.
4.43%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.64%
Broadcom Inc.
2.74%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.99%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.93%
Visa, Inc.
1.73%
Tesla, Inc.
1.72%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.72%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.53%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.47%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.40%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.34%
Frequently asked questions about IWL and ADME
How have the IWL and ADME ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, IWL is up 7.38% year-to-date (YTD), while ADME has returned 7.27%. That puts IWL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWL or ADME?
Year-to-date, the IWL ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$26M for ADME.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWL or ADME?
Over the past year, IWL had a volatility of 13.25%, while ADME experienced 10.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWL or ADME?
As of July 24, 2026, IWL holds $2.17 B in assets under management (AUM), while ADME manages $289.08 M.
What sectors do the IWL and ADME ETFs invest in?
IWL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, ADME focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the IWL ETF and ADME ETF?
IWL top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. ADME holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IWL or ADME?
IWL holds 201 securities with 49.56% of its assets in the top 15. ADME has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.32%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
