Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWFGvsIWYETF Comparison
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IWFG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.2%, versus 0.2% for IWY. IWFG is down -7.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$536K in YTD flows. IWY performs better with -4.79% YTD performance, and +$137M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWFG and IWY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWFG vs IWY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWFG IWY | -2.19%-1.35% | -9.18%-5.63% | -7.64%-4.79% | +15.26%+24.82% | +93.06%+110.54% | n/a+103.14% |
| Flows | IWFG IWY | +$1K+$26M | -$536K-$373M | -$536K+$137M | +$46M+$658M | +$47M+$3.99B | -+$5.67B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWFG IWY | +16.73%+15.73% | +22.57%+22.35% | +19.50%+19.23% | n/a+21.50% |
| Max drawdown | IWFG IWY | -10.20%-7.20% | -14.95%-15.39% | -21.89%-23.25% | n/a-32.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWFG IWY | 90d73d | 37d45d | 133d192d | n/a715d |
IWFG | IWY | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.40 | $259.02 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $49.25 | $263.56 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWFG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWFG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.40 | $259.02 |
| 1D performance | -1.73% | -1.72% |
| AuM | $54.28 M | $15.55 B |
| E/R | 1.2% | 0.2% |
IWFG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | New York Life Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell Top 200 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 105 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2022 | September 22, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWFG and IWY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, IWFG is down -7.64% year-to-date (YTD), while IWY has lost -4.79%. That puts IWY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWFG or IWY?
Year-to-date, the IWFG ETF saw -$536K in flows, compared to +$137M for IWY.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWFG or IWY?
Over the past year, IWFG had a volatility of 22.57%, while IWY experienced 22.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWFG or IWY?
As of March 10, 2026, IWFG holds $54.28 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWY manages $15.55 B.
What sectors do the IWFG and IWY ETFs invest in?
IWFG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWY focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWFG ETF and IWY ETF?
IWFG top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and AMAZON.COM INC. IWY holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWFG or IWY?
IWFG holds 24 securities with 78.95% of its assets in the top 15. IWY has 111 securities and a top 15 weight of 71.69%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
