Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWBvsLCTUETF Comparison
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is part of the segment. IWB's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, LCTU's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. IWB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.3% for LCTU. IWB is down -2.33% year-to-date (YTD) with -$318M in YTD flows. LCTU performs worse with -3.09% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWB and LCTU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWB vs LCTU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWB LCTU | -2.31%-2.22% | -2.16%-3.04% | -2.33%-3.09% | +20.21%+19.38% | +78.51%+75.37% | +73.99%n/a |
| Flows | IWB LCTU | -$67M+$13M | -$58M+$30M | -$318M+$26M | +$951M+$31M | -$954M-$593M | +$206M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWB LCTU | +12.16%+12.11% | +18.49%+18.62% | +15.02%+15.11% | +17.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWB LCTU | -4.36%-4.86% | -13.95%-14.18% | -19.16%-19.80% | -25.17%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWB LCTU | 44d59d | 45d45d | 126d127d | 709dn/a |
IWB | LCTU | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $362.62 | $71.25 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $364.59 | $71.70 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWB | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWB | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $362.62 | $71.25 |
| 1D performance | -0.54% | -0.63% |
| AuM | $44.89 B | $1.40 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.3% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWB and LCTU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWB is down -2.33% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTU has lost -3.09%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWB or LCTU?
Year-to-date, the IWB ETF saw -$318M in flows, compared to +$26M for LCTU.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWB or LCTU?
Over the past year, IWB had a volatility of 18.49%, while LCTU experienced 18.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWB or LCTU?
As of March 12, 2026, IWB holds $44.89 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCTU manages $1.40 B.
What sectors do the IWB and LCTU ETFs invest in?
IWB leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, LCTU focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWB ETF and LCTU ETF?
IWB top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. LCTU holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWB or LCTU?
IWB holds 1008 securities with 40.55% of its assets in the top 15. LCTU has 302 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.05%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
