Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IUSvsFNDBETF Comparison
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. IUS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. In contrast, FNDB's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. IUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. IUS is up 2.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$105K in YTD flows. FNDB performs better with 2.54% YTD performance, and +$57M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IUS and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IUS vs FNDB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IUS FNDB | -2.18%-3.22% | +2.11%+1.89% | +2.47%+2.54% | +21.98%+22.00% | +69.26%+66.41% | +80.53%+71.91% |
| Flows | IUS FNDB | -$1M+$24M | +$105K+$68M | +$105K+$57M | -$14M+$87M | +$336M+$321M | +$338M+$479M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IUS FNDB | +10.06%+11.09% | +15.96%+16.78% | +12.90%+13.77% | +15.01%+15.66% |
| Max drawdown | IUS FNDB | -3.53%-4.63% | -12.34%-12.93% | -15.50%-16.85% | -18.81%-19.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | IUS FNDB | 29d29d | 51d52d | 131d213d | 457d546d |
IUS | FNDB | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.35 | $27.17 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $58.55 | $27.23 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IUS | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IUS | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.35 | $27.17 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -0.22% |
| AuM | $714.29 M | $1.13 B |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.25% |
IUS | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Invesco Strategic US Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index |
| N° of holdings | 517 | 1290 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2018 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IUS and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IUS is up 2.47% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 2.54%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IUS or FNDB?
Year-to-date, the IUS ETF saw +$105K in flows, compared to +$57M for FNDB.
Which ETF is more volatile: IUS or FNDB?
Over the past year, IUS had a volatility of 15.96%, while FNDB experienced 16.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: IUS or FNDB?
As of March 12, 2026, IUS holds $714.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.13 B.
What sectors do the IUS and FNDB ETFs invest in?
IUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IUS ETF and FNDB ETF?
IUS top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. FNDB holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: IUS or FNDB?
IUS holds 544 securities with 34.19% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1372 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.76%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
