ITWOvsSCDSETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is part of the US Small Cap segment. ITWO's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, SCDS's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. ITWO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.4% for SCDS. ITWO is up 19.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$73M in YTD flows. SCDS performs better with 24.17% YTD performance, and -$6K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ITWO and SCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ITWO vs SCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ITWO SCDS | -3.20%-2.41% | +7.05%+9.42% | +19.06%+24.17% | +30.61%+35.53% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | ITWO SCDS | +$7M- | +$12M-$2K | +$73M-$6K | +$116M-$2K | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ITWO SCDS | +18.40%+18.10% | +18.51%+18.31% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | ITWO SCDS | -4.67%-3.50% | -9.74%-8.90% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ITWO SCDS | 16d7d | 81d78d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
ITWO | SCDS | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 5:24 PM | $45.43 | $74.56 |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $45.01 | $75.43 |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexITWO | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 5:24 PM
Live
Closed
ITWO | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.43 | $74.56 |
| 1D performance | +0.93% | -1.16% |
| AuM | $195.47 M | $8.91 M |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
ITWO | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | ProShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Cboe Russell 2000 Daily Covered Call Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1858 | 256 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 4, 2024 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ITWO
USA
79.77%
Other
20.23%
SCDS
USA
92.65%
Other
7.35%
Sectors
ITWO
Finance
19.62%
Healthcare
14.67%
Technology
14.21%
Industrials
13.15%
Other
38.35%
SCDS
Finance
22.37%
Technology
20.3%
Industrials
15.72%
Healthcare
14.25%
Other
27.36%
Advertisement
Diversification
ITWO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.3%
SCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.76%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ITWO
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.76%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
1.07%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.64%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.53%
Fabrinet
0.50%
IonQ, Inc.
0.46%
Nextpower, Inc.
0.42%
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.42%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.39%
SiTime Corp.
0.38%
Semtech Corp.
0.36%
Modine Manufacturing Co.
0.36%
Dycom Industries, Inc.
0.35%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
0.33%
EchoStar Corp.
0.33%
SCDS
Bloom Energy Corp.
2.44%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
1.94%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
1.76%
Vicor Corp.
1.51%
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
1.38%
Fabrinet
1.31%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.22%
Modine Manufacturing Co.
1.11%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
1.09%
MYR Group, Inc.
1.08%
AZZ, Inc.
1.02%
Moog, Inc.
0.99%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.99%
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
0.96%
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
0.96%
Frequently asked questions about ITWO and SCDS
How have the ITWO and SCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, ITWO is up 19.06% year-to-date (YTD), while SCDS has returned 24.17%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ITWO or SCDS?
Year-to-date, the ITWO ETF saw +$73M in flows, compared to -$6K for SCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: ITWO or SCDS?
Over the past year, ITWO had a volatility of 18.51%, while SCDS experienced 18.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: ITWO or SCDS?
As of July 29, 2026, ITWO holds $195.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCDS manages $8.91 M.
What sectors do the ITWO and SCDS ETFs invest in?
ITWO leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, SCDS focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ITWO ETF and SCDS ETF?
ITWO top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. SCDS holds in its top three: Bloom Energy Corp., Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. and TTM Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ITWO or SCDS?
ITWO holds 1866 securities with 8.3% of its assets in the top 15. SCDS has 256 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.76%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ITWO & SCDS
Advertisement
