ITMvsVCRMETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. ITM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.12% for VCRM. ITM is down -2.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$176M in YTD flows. VCRM performs better with -1.33% YTD performance, and +$1.84B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ITM and VCRM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ITM vs VCRM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ITM VCRM | +0.07%-0.38% | -3.17%-3.26% | -2.88%-1.33% | -2.05%-0.75% | +10.27%n/a | -0.94%n/a |
| Flows | ITM VCRM | +$174M+$677M | +$110M+$905M | +$176M+$1.84B | +$259M+$2.06B | +$343M- | +$507M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ITM VCRM | +5.25%+5.29% | +3.33%+3.35% | +3.74%n/a | +3.77%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ITM VCRM | -5.93%-5.68% | -7.74%-6.33% | -7.74%n/a | -14.22%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ITM VCRM | 92d92d | 229d102d | 229dn/a | 1387dn/a |
Trading data
ITM | VCRM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.83 | $72.58 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $44.85 | $72.68 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 18, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
VCRM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexITM | VCRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ITM | VCRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.83 | $72.58 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $2.20 B | $2.59 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.12% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ITM
USA
52.78%
Other
47.22%
VCRM
USA
50.9%
Other
49.1%
Sectors
ITM
Municipal
52.78%
Other
47.22%
VCRM
Municipal
50.9%
Other
49.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
ITM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.34%
VCRM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
ITM
US646067KE77
0.55%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1aug2055, USD (2024C)
0.51%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1feb2055, USD (2024F)
0.47%
California, 4% 1mar2036, USD
0.45%
Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1jul2064, USD (2025B-2)
0.39%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1jan2056, USD (2024H)
0.38%
US74440DFC39
0.33%
US64972GE267
0.30%
California, 5.25% 1aug2032, USD
0.30%
US63607WBD56
0.29%
California Housing Finance Agency, 3.75% 25mar2035, USD (2021-2, A)
0.29%
Southeast Energy Authority, 5.25% 1nov2055, USD (2025F)
0.28%
US569203NS77
0.28%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 4% 1jun2051, USD (2021A)
0.27%
Commonwealth Financing Authority, 4% 1jun2039, USD (2018)
0.25%
VCRM
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025)
0.71%
US09182TEC71
0.61%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022)
0.53%
Jefferson Sales Tax District, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2017B)
0.52%
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 1jul2042, USD (2021-A)
0.48%
State of Hawaii, 4% 1may2036, USD
0.47%
US625517PJ02
0.46%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1dec2034, USD (2026)
0.45%
PEFA Inc., 5% 1apr2035, USD (2026A)
0.44%
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, 6% 1jan2057, USD (2026B)
0.44%
Energy Southeast, 5% 1sep2033, USD (2025B)
0.42%
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, 5.75% 1jul2062, USD (2023-1, A)
0.41%
US235330AW70
0.40%
US57563WAC29
0.40%
Indiana Finance Authority, 5% 1oct2046, USD (2016A)
0.38%
Frequently asked questions about ITM and VCRM
How have the ITM and VCRM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, ITM is down -2.88% year-to-date (YTD), while VCRM has lost -1.33%. That puts VCRM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ITM or VCRM?
Year-to-date, the ITM ETF saw +$176M in flows, compared to +$1.84B for VCRM.
Which ETF is more volatile: ITM or VCRM?
Over the past year, ITM had a volatility of 3.33%, while VCRM experienced 3.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: ITM or VCRM?
As of October 16, 2026, ITM holds $2.20 B in assets under management (AUM), while VCRM manages $2.59 B.
What sectors do the ITM and VCRM ETFs invest in?
ITM leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, VCRM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the ITM ETF and VCRM ETF?
ITM top holdings include US646067KE77, California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1aug2055, USD (2024C) and California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1feb2055, USD (2024F). VCRM holds in its top three: Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025), US09182TEC71 and Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022).
Which ETF is more diversified: ITM or VCRM?
ITM holds 1325 securities with 5.34% of its assets in the top 15. VCRM has 2385 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.11%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
