Turn ETF ideas into real portfolios. Try the builder now →
IPACvsVPLETF Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) belong to the same industry segment: DM Blended Cap. IPAC's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, VPL's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. IPAC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.07% for VPL. IPAC is up 3.18% year-to-date (YTD) with +$103M in YTD flows. VPL performs better with 7.79% YTD performance, and -$1.60B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IPAC and VPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IPAC vs VPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IPAC VPL | -9.24%-8.90% | +2.43%+7.85% | +3.18%+7.79% | +23.26%+35.52% | +52.93%+63.53% | +36.61%+42.39% |
| Flows | IPAC VPL | +$56M-$467M | +$103M-$1.63B | +$103M-$1.60B | -$46M-$1.73B | +$164M-$1.34B | +$741M+$456M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IPAC VPL | +19.38%+21.56% | +18.46%+18.55% | +16.02%+15.81% | +16.14%+15.99% |
| Max drawdown | IPAC VPL | -11.30%-12.10% | -13.38%-12.95% | -15.72%-16.37% | -29.73%-31.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | IPAC VPL | 41d23d | 31d31d | 225d239d | 1030d1101d |
IPAC | VPL | |
Last sale 3/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.54 | $97.53 |
| Previous close 03/24/2026 | $75.99 | $98.83 |
| Consolidated volume 03/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IPAC | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IPAC | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.54 | $97.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.59% | -1.32% |
| AuM | $2.34 B | $7.64 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.07% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IPAC and VPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 24, 2026, IPAC is up 3.18% year-to-date (YTD), while VPL has returned 7.79%. That puts VPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IPAC or VPL?
Year-to-date, the IPAC ETF saw +$103M in flows, compared to -$1.60B for VPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: IPAC or VPL?
Over the past year, IPAC had a volatility of 18.46%, while VPL experienced 18.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: IPAC or VPL?
As of March 24, 2026, IPAC holds $2.34 B in assets under management (AUM), while VPL manages $7.64 B.
What sectors do the IPAC and VPL ETFs invest in?
IPAC leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, VPL focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IPAC ETF and VPL ETF?
IPAC top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA. VPL holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, SK HYNIX and TOYOTA.
Which ETF is more diversified: IPAC or VPL?
IPAC holds 1353 securities with 23.25% of its assets in the top 15. VPL has 2347 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.27%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
