IPACvsJPYETF Comparison
VS
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) belongs to the DM Blended Cap segment. Lazard Japanese Equity ETF (JPY) is part of the Japan Blended Cap segment. IPAC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, JPY's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. IPAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.6% for JPY. IPAC is up 15.07% year-to-date (YTD) with +$211M in YTD flows. JPY performs better with 22.28% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IPAC and JPY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IPAC vs JPY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IPAC JPY | -1.97%-1.20% | +1.92%+3.78% | +15.07%+22.28% | +17.54%+23.76% | +68.15%n/a | +48.35%n/a |
| Flows | IPAC JPY | -$8M+$48K | +$34M+$2M | +$211M+$5M | +$492M+$10M | +$186M- | +$916M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IPAC JPY | +15.82%+18.10% | +17.96%+21.44% | +16.97%n/a | +16.73%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IPAC JPY | -4.49%-4.42% | -11.30%-15.32% | -15.72%n/a | -27.32%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IPAC JPY | 43d10d | 121d105d | 225dn/a | 843dn/a |
Trading data
IPAC | JPY | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $83.58 | $38.28 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $83.81 | $38.56 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JPY
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIPAC | JPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IPAC | JPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $83.58 | $38.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.27% | -0.72% |
| AuM | $2.69 B | $85.16 M |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
IPAC | JPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Lazard Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI Pacific IMI Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1334 | 62 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 10, 2014 | April 4, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IPAC
Japan
69.43%
Australia
19.43%
Other
11.14%
JPY
Japan
98.92%
Other
1.08%
Sectors
IPAC
Finance
28.46%
Technology
16.54%
Industrials
15%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.23%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.67%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.23%
Other
14.87%
JPY
Finance
24.13%
Industrials
23.78%
Technology
19.11%
Other
32.98%
Advertisement
Diversification
IPAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.8%
JPY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.92%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IPAC
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
2.56%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.99%
Toyota Motor Corp.
1.95%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.66%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.65%
Advantest Corp.
1.61%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.58%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.57%
Sony Group Corp.
1.53%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.31%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.30%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.26%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.25%
AIA Group Ltd.
1.06%
JPY
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
5.65%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
5.29%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
4.59%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
3.66%
Hitachi Ltd.
3.52%
Sony Group Corp.
3.39%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
3.34%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
2.78%
Resona Holdings, Inc.
2.53%
KEYENCE Corp.
2.51%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.38%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
2.15%
Komatsu Ltd.
2.10%
TDK Corp.
2.05%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.99%
Frequently asked questions about IPAC and JPY
How have the IPAC and JPY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IPAC is up 15.07% year-to-date (YTD), while JPY has returned 22.28%. That puts JPY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IPAC or JPY?
Year-to-date, the IPAC ETF saw +$211M in flows, compared to +$5M for JPY.
Which ETF is more volatile: IPAC or JPY?
Over the past year, IPAC had a volatility of 17.96%, while JPY experienced 21.44%.
Which ETF is bigger: IPAC or JPY?
As of October 16, 2026, IPAC holds $2.69 B in assets under management (AUM), while JPY manages $85.16 M.
What sectors do the IPAC and JPY ETFs invest in?
IPAC leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, JPY focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IPAC ETF and JPY ETF?
IPAC top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., BHP Group Ltd. and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. JPY holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd. and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IPAC or JPY?
IPAC holds 1335 securities with 24.8% of its assets in the top 15. JPY has 62 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.92%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
