IPACvsFLJPETF Comparison
VS
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) belongs to the DM Blended Cap segment. Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is part of the Japan Blended Cap segment. IPAC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, FLJP's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. Both IPAC and FLJP have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%. IPAC is up 18.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$245M in YTD flows. FLJP performs better with 18.65% YTD performance, and +$1.06B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IPAC and FLJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IPAC vs FLJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IPAC FLJP | +2.57%+1.46% | +3.79%+3.14% | +18.24%+18.65% | +24.00%+25.88% | +66.18%+68.39% | +49.85%+56.57% |
| Flows | IPAC FLJP | +$51M+$74M | +$134M+$243M | +$245M+$1.06B | +$526M+$1.26B | +$264M+$1.62B | +$950M+$2.60B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IPAC FLJP | +19.36%+22.19% | +17.95%+21.32% | +16.93%+21.83% | +16.72%+20.46% |
| Max drawdown | IPAC FLJP | -4.64%-6.50% | -11.30%-13.65% | -15.72%-18.71% | -29.73%-33.12% |
| Max drawdown duration | IPAC FLJP | 9d49d | 121d110d | 225d235d | 1030d903d |
Trading data
IPAC | FLJP | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 2:01 PM | $86.66 | $41.51 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $85.64 | $40.91 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IPAC | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 2:01 PM
Live
Closed
IPAC | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.66 | $41.51 |
| 1D performance | +1.19% | +1.47% |
| AuM | $2.80 B | $4.10 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
IPAC | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI Pacific IMI Index | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 1366 | 474 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 10, 2014 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IPAC
Japan
68.93%
Australia
19.63%
Other
11.43%
FLJP
Japan
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
IPAC
Finance
29.58%
Industrials
15.2%
Technology
14.97%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.62%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.59%
Other
14.89%
FLJP
Technology
21.65%
Finance
21.63%
Industrials
18.79%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.95%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.25%
Other
19.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
IPAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.98%
FLJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.25%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IPAC
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
2.57%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.29%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
2.27%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.02%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.65%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.59%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.59%
Sony Group Corp.
1.52%
Advantest Corp.
1.40%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.26%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.17%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.17%
AIA Group Ltd.
1.16%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.02%
FLJP
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.12%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.17%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.76%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.61%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.21%
Sony Group Corp.
2.10%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.02%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.00%
Advantest Corp.
2.00%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.70%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.69%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.55%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.53%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.40%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.39%
Frequently asked questions about IPAC and FLJP
How have the IPAC and FLJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, IPAC is up 18.24% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJP has returned 18.65%. That puts FLJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IPAC or FLJP?
Year-to-date, the IPAC ETF saw +$245M in flows, compared to +$1.06B for FLJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: IPAC or FLJP?
Over the past year, IPAC had a volatility of 17.95%, while FLJP experienced 21.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: IPAC or FLJP?
As of September 2, 2026, IPAC holds $2.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLJP manages $4.10 B.
What sectors do the IPAC and FLJP ETFs invest in?
IPAC leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, FLJP focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IPAC ETF and FLJP ETF?
IPAC top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., BHP Group Ltd. and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. FLJP holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Tokyo Electron Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: IPAC or FLJP?
IPAC holds 1368 securities with 23.98% of its assets in the top 15. FLJP has 474 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.25%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IPAC & FLJP
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
July 1, 2024
FLJP
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
April 5, 2024
FLJP
Advertisement
Advertisement
