IPACvsFLJHETF Comparison
VS
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) belongs to the DM Blended Cap segment. Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is part of the Japan Blended Cap segment. IPAC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, FLJH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. Both IPAC and FLJH have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%. IPAC is up 18.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$245M in YTD flows. FLJH performs better with 25.68% YTD performance, and +$65M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IPAC and FLJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IPAC vs FLJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IPAC FLJH | +2.57%+5.59% | +3.79%+5.21% | +18.24%+25.68% | +24.00%+42.48% | +66.18%+112.72% | +49.85%+177.22% |
| Flows | IPAC FLJH | +$51M+$18M | +$134M+$32M | +$245M+$65M | +$526M+$73M | +$264M-$88M | +$950M+$138M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IPAC FLJH | +19.36%+21.74% | +17.95%+20.76% | +16.93%+21.57% | +16.72%+19.47% |
| Max drawdown | IPAC FLJH | -4.64%-5.44% | -11.30%-11.13% | -15.72%-25.01% | -29.73%-25.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | IPAC FLJH | 9d50d | 121d71d | 225d321d | 1030d321d |
Trading data
IPAC | FLJH | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 2:01 PM | $86.66 | $45.65 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $85.64 | $46.07 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IPAC | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 2:01 PM
Live
Closed
IPAC | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.66 | $45.65 |
| 1D performance | +1.19% | -0.91% |
| AuM | $2.80 B | $205.79 M |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
IPAC | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI Pacific IMI Index | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 1366 | 474 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 10, 2014 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IPAC
Japan
68.93%
Australia
19.63%
Other
11.43%
FLJH
Japan
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
IPAC
Finance
29.58%
Industrials
15.2%
Technology
14.97%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.62%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.59%
Other
14.89%
FLJH
Technology
21.92%
Finance
21.48%
Industrials
18.7%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Other
19.67%
Advertisement
Diversification
IPAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.98%
FLJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.31%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IPAC
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
2.57%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.29%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
2.27%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.02%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.65%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.59%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.59%
Sony Group Corp.
1.52%
Advantest Corp.
1.40%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.26%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.17%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.17%
AIA Group Ltd.
1.16%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.02%
FLJH
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.10%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.16%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.74%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.60%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.21%
Sony Group Corp.
2.10%
Advantest Corp.
2.05%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.01%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.99%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.82%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.68%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.54%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.52%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.40%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.39%
Frequently asked questions about IPAC and FLJH
How have the IPAC and FLJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, IPAC is up 18.24% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJH has returned 25.68%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IPAC or FLJH?
Year-to-date, the IPAC ETF saw +$245M in flows, compared to +$65M for FLJH.
Which ETF is more volatile: IPAC or FLJH?
Over the past year, IPAC had a volatility of 17.95%, while FLJH experienced 20.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: IPAC or FLJH?
As of September 2, 2026, IPAC holds $2.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLJH manages $205.79 M.
What sectors do the IPAC and FLJH ETFs invest in?
IPAC leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, FLJH focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IPAC ETF and FLJH ETF?
IPAC top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., BHP Group Ltd. and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. FLJH holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Tokyo Electron Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: IPAC or FLJH?
IPAC holds 1368 securities with 23.98% of its assets in the top 15. FLJH has 474 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.31%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
