BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

IPACvsFLJHETF Comparison

ETF 1

IPAC

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

This fund is part of

DM Blended Cap

+1.34%

Full IPAC fund page

VS

ETF 2

FLJH

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

This fund is part of

Japan Blended Cap

+2.01%

Full FLJH fund page

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) belongs to the DM Blended Cap segment. Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is part of the Japan Blended Cap segment. IPAC's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FLJH's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Both IPAC and FLJH have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%. IPAC is up 4.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$103M in YTD flows. FLJH performs better with 7.76% YTD performance, and +$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IPAC and FLJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

IPAC vs FLJH performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 03/25/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	IPAC FLJH	-7.76%-4.84%	+3.98%+7.48%	+4.87%+7.76%	+24.76%+37.92%	+55.30%+126.69%	+37.80%+143.78%
Flows	IPAC FLJH	+$56M-	+$103M+$20M	+$103M+$20M	-$46M+$25M	+$164M+$87M	+$741M+$81M

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	IPAC FLJH	+19.65%+24.97%	+18.52%+21.66%	+16.05%+20.55%	+16.15%+18.95%
Max drawdown	IPAC FLJH	-11.30%-11.13%	-13.38%-18.06%	-15.72%-25.01%	-29.73%-25.01%
Max drawdown duration	IPAC FLJH	42d24d	31d62d	225d321d	1030d321d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	IPAC	FLJH
Last sale 3/26/2026 at 1:30 PM	$75.00	$39.73
Previous close 03/25/2026	$76.73	$40.53
Consolidated volume 03/25/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of February 27, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	IPAC	FLJH
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 3/26/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	IPAC	FLJH
Last price	$75.00	$39.73
1D performance	-2.25%	-1.97%
AuM	$2.38 B	$137.21 M
E/R	0.09%	0.09%

Characteristics

	IPAC	FLJH
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	iShares	Franklin Templeton
Benchmark	MSCI Pacific IMI Index	FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index
N° of holdings	1301	474
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	June 10, 2014	November 2, 2017
ESG	No	No

More IPAC data on Trackinsight

More FLJH data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

IPAC

Japan

69.16%

Australia

19.79%

Other

11.05%

FLJH

Japan

100%

Other

0%

Sectors

IPAC

Financials

21.95%

Industrials

20.89%

Consumer Discreti.

12.55%

Information Techn.

10.03%

Materials

8.59%

Other

25.98%

FLJH

Industrials

25.94%

Consumer Discreti.

16.33%

Financials

15.9%

Information Techn.

12.92%

Other

28.91%

Diversification

IPAC

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

23.25%

FLJH

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

31.14%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of February 28, 2026

IPAC

TOYOTA

2.42%

MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP

2.27%

COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA

2.23%

BHP GROUP LTD

2.20%

HITACHI

1.60%

SUMITOMO MITSUI

1.46%

ADVANTEST

1.46%

SONY GROUP CORPORATION

1.42%

TOKYO ELECTRON

1.37%

AIA

1.20%

MIZUHO FINANCIAL

1.18%

NATL AUST BANK

1.13%

MITSUBISHI

1.13%

WESTPAC BANKING

1.10%

SOFTBANK GROUP CORP

1.09%

FLJH

TOYOTA

4.14%

MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP

3.44%

SUMITOMO MITSUI

2.36%

HITACHI

2.32%

SONY GROUP CORPORATION

2.15%

TOKYO ELECTRON

2.08%

ADVANTEST

1.99%

MIZUHO FINANCIAL

1.86%

SOFTBANK GROUP CORP

1.81%

MITSUBISHI

1.74%

MITSUBISHI HVY

1.70%

ITOCHU

1.49%

MITSUI

1.49%

TOKIO MARINE HOLDINGS

1.28%

FAST RETAILING

1.27%

Frequently asked questions about IPAC and FLJH

How have the IPAC and FLJH ETFs performed in 2026?

As of March 25, 2026, IPAC is up 4.87% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJH has returned 7.76%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IPAC or FLJH?

Year-to-date, the IPAC ETF saw +$103M in flows, compared to +$20M for FLJH.

Which ETF is more volatile: IPAC or FLJH?

Over the past year, IPAC had a volatility of 18.52%, while FLJH experienced 21.66%.

Which ETF is bigger: IPAC or FLJH?

As of March 25, 2026, IPAC holds $2.38 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLJH manages $137.21 M.

What sectors do the IPAC and FLJH ETFs invest in?

IPAC leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FLJH focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.

What are the top holdings of the IPAC ETF and FLJH ETF?

IPAC top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA. FLJH holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and SUMITOMO MITSUI.

IPACvsFLJHETF Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

IPAC vs FLJH performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the IPAC and FLJH ETFs performed in 2026?

As of March 25, 2026, IPAC is up 4.87% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJH has returned 7.76%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IPAC or FLJH?

Year-to-date, the IPAC ETF saw +$103M in flows, compared to +$20M for FLJH.

Which ETF is more volatile: IPAC or FLJH?

Over the past year, IPAC had a volatility of 18.52%, while FLJH experienced 21.66%.

Which ETF is bigger: IPAC or FLJH?

As of March 25, 2026, IPAC holds $2.38 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLJH manages $137.21 M.

What sectors do the IPAC and FLJH ETFs invest in?

IPAC leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FLJH focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.

What are the top holdings of the IPAC ETF and FLJH ETF?

IPAC top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA. FLJH holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and SUMITOMO MITSUI.

Which ETF is more diversified: IPAC or FLJH?

IPAC holds 1353 securities with 23.25% of its assets in the top 15. FLJH has 484 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.14%.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up