INVNvsPOWAETF Comparison
VS
Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. INVN's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, POWA's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. INVN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.95%, versus 0.4% for POWA. INVN is up 21.13% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. POWA performs worse with -3.05% YTD performance, and -$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of INVN and POWA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
INVN vs POWA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | INVN POWA | +2.16%-5.65% | +27.32%+0.27% | +21.13%-3.05% | +23.74%-1.58% | n/a+33.86% | n/a+36.05% |
| Flows | INVN POWA | +$1M-$5M | -$2M-$7M | -$6M-$17M | -$6M-$18M | --$90M | --$248M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | INVN POWA | +28.33%+11.79% | +24.87%+12.18% | n/a+13.04% | n/a+14.06% |
| Max drawdown | INVN POWA | -6.86%-7.49% | -20.34%-9.77% | n/a-14.85% | n/a-17.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | INVN POWA | 14d37d | 142d233d | n/a208d | n/a709d |
Trading data
INVN | POWA | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.84 | $86.88 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $26.23 | $87.11 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
INVN | POWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
INVN | POWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.84 | $86.88 |
| 1D performance | -1.49% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $10.49 M | $166.48 M |
| E/R | 0.95% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
INVN | POWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fred Alger Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Alger Russell Innovation Index | Bloomberg Pricing Power Total Return Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 6, 2025 | December 15, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
INVN
USA
97.93%
Other
2.07%
POWA
USA
90.33%
Other
9.67%
Sectors
INVN
Technology
59.75%
Healthcare
19.22%
Finance
9.12%
Other
11.91%
POWA
Technology
23.24%
Healthcare
19.38%
Industrials
15.8%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.38%
Consumer Cyclical.
12.23%
Other
13.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
INVN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.02%
POWA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.76%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
INVN
RingCentral, Inc.
2.53%
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
2.48%
Bill Holdings, Inc.
2.46%
Zebra Technologies Corp.
2.39%
Expedia Group, Inc.
2.37%
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings, Inc.
2.28%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.24%
Procore Technologies, Inc.
2.22%
HubSpot, Inc.
2.17%
Klaviyo, Inc.
2.17%
Figma, Inc.
2.16%
Block, Inc.
2.15%
DocuSign, Inc.
2.14%
Zscaler, Inc.
2.14%
GitLab, Inc.
2.13%
POWA
Best Buy Co., Inc.
2.82%
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.
2.44%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
2.41%
US Foods Holding Corp.
2.40%
Hormel Foods Corp.
2.37%
Garmin Ltd.
2.36%
Cencora, Inc.
2.29%
The Cooper Cos., Inc.
2.25%
HEICO Corp.
2.24%
McKesson Corp.
2.24%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.23%
Brown-Forman Corp.
2.19%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
2.19%
GoDaddy, Inc.
2.17%
Sysco Corp.
2.15%
Frequently asked questions about INVN and POWA
How have the INVN and POWA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, INVN is up 21.13% year-to-date (YTD), while POWA has lost -3.05%. That puts INVN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: INVN or POWA?
Year-to-date, the INVN ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to -$17M for POWA.
Which ETF is more volatile: INVN or POWA?
Over the past year, INVN had a volatility of 24.87%, while POWA experienced 12.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: INVN or POWA?
As of September 17, 2026, INVN holds $10.49 M in assets under management (AUM), while POWA manages $166.48 M.
What sectors do the INVN and POWA ETFs invest in?
INVN leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, POWA focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the INVN ETF and POWA ETF?
INVN top holdings include RingCentral, Inc., PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Bill Holdings, Inc.. POWA holds in its top three: Best Buy Co., Inc., Mettler-Toledo International, Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: INVN or POWA?
INVN holds 50 securities with 34.02% of its assets in the top 15. POWA has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.76%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
