Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
INTFvsQINTETF Comparison
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. INTF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.39% for QINT. INTF is up 1.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$151M in YTD flows. QINT performs better with 3.64% YTD performance, and +$74M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of INTF and QINT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
INTF vs QINT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | INTF QINT | -6.60%-5.38% | +2.49%+4.18% | +1.67%+3.64% | +27.68%+31.35% | +67.17%+74.89% | +60.12%+55.63% |
| Flows | INTF QINT | +$64M+$13M | +$184M+$87M | +$151M+$74M | +$1.27B+$180M | +$1.49B+$196M | +$1.64B+$292M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | INTF QINT | +14.96%+14.31% | +15.98%+15.89% | +14.03%+13.87% | +15.41%+15.64% |
| Max drawdown | INTF QINT | -8.13%-6.37% | -13.30%-13.48% | -13.30%-13.48% | -29.01%-33.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | INTF QINT | 12d14d | 37d37d | 37d37d | 872d932d |
INTF | QINT | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.33 | $64.46 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $38.77 | $65.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
INTF | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
INTF | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.33 | $64.46 |
| 1D performance | -1.13% | -1.32% |
| AuM | $3.09 B | $530.24 M |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.39% |
INTF | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | STOXX International Equity Factor Index | Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 444 | 344 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 28, 2015 | September 10, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the INTF and QINT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, INTF is up 1.67% year-to-date (YTD), while QINT has returned 3.64%. That puts QINT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: INTF or QINT?
Year-to-date, the INTF ETF saw +$151M in flows, compared to +$74M for QINT.
Which ETF is more volatile: INTF or QINT?
Over the past year, INTF had a volatility of 15.98%, while QINT experienced 15.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: INTF or QINT?
As of March 13, 2026, INTF holds $3.09 B in assets under management (AUM), while QINT manages $530.24 M.
What sectors do the INTF and QINT ETFs invest in?
INTF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QINT focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the INTF ETF and QINT ETF?
INTF top holdings include ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and ROCHE. QINT holds in its top three: HSBC HOLDINGS, BNP PARIBAS and RIO TINTO.
Which ETF is more diversified: INTF or QINT?
INTF holds 469 securities with 16.12% of its assets in the top 15. QINT has 365 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.86%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
