Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
INTFvsMFDXETF Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. INTF's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, MFDX's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Materials. INTF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.4% for MFDX. INTF is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$136M in YTD flows. MFDX performs better with 3.56% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of INTF and MFDX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
INTF vs MFDX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | INTF MFDX | -5.58%-5.42% | +4.23%+5.15% | +2.54%+3.56% | +27.82%+27.67% | +68.59%+64.28% | +61.80%+62.06% |
| Flows | INTF MFDX | +$49M- | +$169M- | +$136M- | +$1.27B+$36M | +$1.48B+$168M | +$1.62B+$222M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | INTF MFDX | +14.93%+13.68% | +15.97%+14.23% | +14.03%+12.84% | +15.41%+14.68% |
| Max drawdown | INTF MFDX | -7.35%-7.42% | -13.30%-11.25% | -13.30%-11.25% | -29.01%-25.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | INTF MFDX | 11d11d | 37d35d | 37d35d | 872d700d |
INTF | MFDX | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.33 | $39.56 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $38.77 | $40.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
INTF | MFDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
INTF | MFDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.33 | $39.56 |
| 1D performance | -1.13% | -1.15% |
| AuM | $3.10 B | $421.41 M |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.4% |
INTF | MFDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | PIMCO |
| Benchmark | STOXX International Equity Factor Index | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Dev. ex-US Index |
| N° of holdings | 444 | 1129 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 28, 2015 | August 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the INTF and MFDX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, INTF is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD), while MFDX has returned 3.56%. That puts MFDX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: INTF or MFDX?
Year-to-date, the INTF ETF saw +$136M in flows, compared to - for MFDX.
Which ETF is more volatile: INTF or MFDX?
Over the past year, INTF had a volatility of 15.97%, while MFDX experienced 14.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: INTF or MFDX?
As of March 12, 2026, INTF holds $3.10 B in assets under management (AUM), while MFDX manages $421.41 M.
What sectors do the INTF and MFDX ETFs invest in?
INTF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, MFDX focuses on Industrials, Financials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the INTF ETF and MFDX ETF?
INTF top holdings include ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and ROCHE. MFDX holds in its top three: BANCO SANTANDER SA, BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: INTF or MFDX?
INTF holds 469 securities with 16.12% of its assets in the top 15. MFDX has 1192 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.73%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
