Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
INTFvsGSIEETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. INTF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.25% for GSIE. INTF is up 1.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$151M in YTD flows. GSIE performs better with 2.19% YTD performance, and +$216M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of INTF and GSIE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
INTF vs GSIE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | INTF GSIE | -6.60%-4.88% | +2.49%+3.54% | +1.67%+2.19% | +27.68%+25.73% | +67.17%+60.66% | +60.12%+53.41% |
| Flows | INTF GSIE | +$64M+$41M | +$184M+$216M | +$151M+$216M | +$1.27B+$625M | +$1.49B+$711M | +$1.64B+$1.79B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | INTF GSIE | +14.96%+13.10% | +15.98%+14.72% | +14.03%+12.87% | +15.41%+14.16% |
| Max drawdown | INTF GSIE | -8.13%-7.37% | -13.30%-13.08% | -13.30%-13.08% | -29.01%-29.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | INTF GSIE | 12d10d | 37d37d | 37d37d | 872d911d |
INTF | GSIE | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.33 | $42.84 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $38.77 | $43.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
INTF | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
INTF | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.33 | $42.84 |
| 1D performance | -1.13% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $3.09 B | $5.20 B |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.25% |
INTF | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | STOXX International Equity Factor Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 444 | 598 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 28, 2015 | November 6, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the INTF and GSIE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, INTF is up 1.67% year-to-date (YTD), while GSIE has returned 2.19%. That puts GSIE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: INTF or GSIE?
Year-to-date, the INTF ETF saw +$151M in flows, compared to +$216M for GSIE.
Which ETF is more volatile: INTF or GSIE?
Over the past year, INTF had a volatility of 15.98%, while GSIE experienced 14.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: INTF or GSIE?
As of March 13, 2026, INTF holds $3.09 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSIE manages $5.20 B.
What sectors do the INTF and GSIE ETFs invest in?
INTF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSIE focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the INTF ETF and GSIE ETF?
INTF top holdings include ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and ROCHE. GSIE holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: INTF or GSIE?
INTF holds 469 securities with 16.12% of its assets in the top 15. GSIE has 629 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.67%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
