INEQvsFNDFETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.58%
Columbia International Equity Income ETF - USD (INEQ) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. INEQ's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Industrials. INEQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. INEQ is up 9.21% year-to-date (YTD) with +$42M in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 18.79% YTD performance, and +$2.45B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of INEQ and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
INEQ vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | INEQ FNDF | +0.46%-0.15% | -3.83%-1.22% | +9.21%+18.79% | +15.52%+25.81% | +76.08%+87.37% | +84.16%+88.50% |
| Flows | INEQ FNDF | -$6M+$231M | -$6M+$870M | +$42M+$2.45B | +$47M+$3.21B | +$75M+$5.87B | +$76M+$9.75B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | INEQ FNDF | +11.17%+8.82% | +12.48%+14.28% | +14.41%+13.83% | +14.64%+14.73% |
| Max drawdown | INEQ FNDF | -7.97%-5.46% | -9.21%-10.49% | -15.76%-13.78% | -24.03%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | INEQ FNDF | 60d56d | 150d65d | 47d44d | 459d545d |
Trading data
INEQ | FNDF | |
Last sale 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM | $40.57 | $54.77 |
| Previous close 11/03/2026 | $39.17 | $53.61 |
| Consolidated volume 11/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
INEQ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexINEQ | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
INEQ | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.57 | $54.77 |
| 1D performance | +3.57% | +2.16% |
| AuM | $92.62 M | $25.63 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
INEQ | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 854 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2016 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
INEQ
Japan
29.24%
Germany
17.35%
United Kingdom
12.5%
Australia
10.31%
Other
30.6%
FNDF
Japan
23.17%
United Kingdom
14%
Canada
8.74%
France
8.3%
Germany
7.91%
Republic of Korea
7.84%
Other
30.04%
Sectors
INEQ
Finance
30%
Industrials
16.28%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.38%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.81%
Healthcare
7.91%
Other
20.62%
FNDF
Finance
20.13%
Energy
12.75%
Industrials
11.52%
Technology
10.86%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.73%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.04%
Other
24.98%
Advertisement
Diversification
INEQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.93%
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
INEQ
BHP Group Ltd.
4.62%
Siemens Energy AG
4.34%
Deutsche Telekom AG
4.32%
Mitsubishi Corp.
4.18%
UniCredit SpA
4.17%
Rio Tinto Plc
3.70%
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG
3.49%
NatWest Group Plc
3.10%
Anheuser-Busch InBev NV
2.94%
VINCI SA
2.84%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
2.75%
HOYA Corp.
2.49%
Standard Chartered Plc
2.31%
ORIX Corp.
1.85%
Daiichi Life Group, Inc.
1.83%
FNDF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.34%
Shell Plc
2.76%
TotalEnergies SE
1.85%
BP Plc
1.19%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.11%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.11%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.99%
Roche Holding AG
0.92%
Glencore Plc
0.90%
Banco Santander SA
0.83%
Nestlé SA
0.76%
Deutsche Telekom AG
0.76%
Rio Tinto Plc
0.66%
Novartis AG
0.63%
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
0.60%
Frequently asked questions about INEQ and FNDF
How have the INEQ and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, INEQ is up 9.21% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 18.79%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: INEQ or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the INEQ ETF saw +$42M in flows, compared to +$2.45B for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: INEQ or FNDF?
Over the past year, INEQ had a volatility of 12.48%, while FNDF experienced 14.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: INEQ or FNDF?
As of November 2, 2026, INEQ holds $92.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $25.63 B.
What sectors do the INEQ and FNDF ETFs invest in?
INEQ leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Finance, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the INEQ ETF and FNDF ETF?
INEQ top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Siemens Energy AG and Deutsche Telekom AG. FNDF holds in its top three: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Shell Plc and TotalEnergies SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: INEQ or FNDF?
INEQ holds 101 securities with 48.93% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 875 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.41%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
