INCOvsCNQQETF Comparison
VS
Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) belong to the same industry segment: EM Awakening. INCO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Cyclicals, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, CNQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. INCO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.76%, versus 0.75% for CNQQ. INCO is down -11.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$54M in YTD flows. CNQQ performs worse with -16.98% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of INCO and CNQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
INCO vs CNQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | INCO CNQQ | -1.86%-11.81% | -5.06%-17.84% | -11.25%-16.98% | -12.62%-21.97% | +16.86%n/a | +25.42%n/a |
| Flows | INCO CNQQ | -$3M-$3M | -$15M-$2M | -$54M+$33M | -$57M+$40M | +$94M- | +$126M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | INCO CNQQ | +14.57%+24.02% | +18.50%+26.14% | +16.53%n/a | +16.89%n/a |
| Max drawdown | INCO CNQQ | -11.31%-24.07% | -19.80%-29.55% | -29.63%n/a | -29.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | INCO CNQQ | 86d72d | 364d120d | 762dn/a | 762dn/a |
Trading data
INCO | CNQQ | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.06 | $18.55 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $57.33 | $19.12 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
INCO | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
INCO | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.06 | $18.55 |
| 1D performance | +1.27% | -2.96% |
| AuM | $202.17 M | $36.48 M |
| E/R | 0.76% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
INCO | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Indxx India Consumer Index | Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 10, 2011 | September 25, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
INCO
India
101.1%
Other
-1.1%
CNQQ
China
99.21%
Other
0.79%
Sectors
INCO
Consumer Cyclical.
52.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.87%
Consumer Services
11.55%
Other
1.33%
CNQQ
Technology
56.89%
Industrials
14.4%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.31%
Healthcare
7.23%
Other
11.17%
Advertisement
Diversification
INCO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68.53%
CNQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.29%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
INCO
Eternal Ltd.
6.56%
Titan Co. Ltd.
5.62%
Bajaj Auto Ltd.
5.53%
Nestlé India Ltd.
5.23%
TVS Motor Co. Ltd.
5.21%
Eicher Motors Ltd.
4.93%
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
4.63%
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
4.40%
Trent Ltd.
4.25%
Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
4.18%
ITC Ltd.
4.02%
Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd.
3.71%
Hero MotoCorp Ltd.
3.63%
Tata Consumer Products Ltd.
3.35%
Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd.
3.28%
CNQQ
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.79%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.42%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
6.16%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
5.71%
Xiaomi Corp.
3.31%
Meituan
2.97%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.67%
NetEase, Inc.
2.33%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.08%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.08%
Advanced Micro Fabrication Equipment, Inc. China
1.93%
GigaDevice Semiconductor, Inc.
1.92%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.70%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.64%
Montage Technology Co., Ltd.
1.59%
Frequently asked questions about INCO and CNQQ
How have the INCO and CNQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, INCO is down -11.25% year-to-date (YTD), while CNQQ has lost -16.98%. That puts INCO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: INCO or CNQQ?
Year-to-date, the INCO ETF saw -$54M in flows, compared to +$33M for CNQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: INCO or CNQQ?
Over the past year, INCO had a volatility of 18.5%, while CNQQ experienced 26.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: INCO or CNQQ?
As of October 28, 2026, INCO holds $202.17 M in assets under management (AUM), while CNQQ manages $36.48 M.
What sectors do the INCO and CNQQ ETFs invest in?
INCO leans toward sectors like Consumer Cyclicals, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, CNQQ focuses on Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the INCO ETF and CNQQ ETF?
INCO top holdings include Eternal Ltd., Titan Co. Ltd. and Bajaj Auto Ltd.. CNQQ holds in its top three: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: INCO or CNQQ?
INCO holds 31 securities with 68.53% of its assets in the top 15. CNQQ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.29%.
Advertisement
Latest news about INCO & CNQQ
Advertisement
