IMFLvsFNDFETF Comparison
ETF 1
IMFL
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.83%
VS
ETF 2
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.83%
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. IMFL's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Materials. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Energy. IMFL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. IMFL is up 15.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$231M in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 19.1% YTD performance, and +$931M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMFL and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IMFL vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMFL FNDF | +3.22%+5.75% | -0.51%+2.56% | +15.30%+19.10% | +32.39%+43.64% | +56.86%+92.21% | +52.43%+89.33% |
| Flows | IMFL FNDF | -$9M+$266M | +$35M+$527M | +$231M+$931M | +$285M+$2.00B | +$607M+$5.18B | +$662M+$8.78B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMFL FNDF | +20.72%+20.48% | +14.47%+13.55% | +14.60%+14.00% | +14.75%+14.70% |
| Max drawdown | IMFL FNDF | -11.97%-10.49% | -11.97%-10.49% | -13.01%-13.78% | -32.34%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | IMFL FNDF | 86d65d | 86d65d | 211d44d | 834d545d |
Trading data
IMFL | FNDF | |
Last sale 5/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.57 | $54.09 |
| Previous close 05/26/2026 | $34.54 | $54.31 |
| Consolidated volume 05/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IMFL | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IMFL | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.57 | $54.09 |
| 1D performance | +0.09% | -0.41% |
| AuM | $991.45 M | $24.33 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
IMFL | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 1082 | 825 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 24, 2021 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IMFL
Japan
29.98%
Republic of Korea
9.92%
Canada
8.06%
Other
52.04%
FNDF
Japan
23.57%
United Kingdom
13.86%
Canada
8.77%
Republic of Korea
8.36%
France
8.19%
Germany
7.62%
Other
29.64%
Sectors
IMFL
Industrials
23.32%
Financials
18.54%
Materials
10.71%
Consumer Discreti.
9.04%
Energy
8.95%
Utilities
7.43%
Other
22%
FNDF
Financials
16.15%
Industrials
14.73%
Energy
12.79%
Consumer Discreti.
11.21%
Materials
10.44%
Information Techn.
8.69%
Other
26%
Advertisement
Diversification
IMFL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.78%
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.48%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IMFL
RWE ST
1.14%
MAGNA INTERNATIONAL
1.08%
ENEOS HOLDINGS INC
1.04%
INPEX
0.95%
WOORI FINANCIAL GROUP INC
0.90%
TESCO
0.81%
HANA FINANCIAL G
0.74%
ACS CONS Y SERV
0.73%
REPSOL YPF SA
0.73%
POLSKI KONCERN
0.71%
KINROSS GOLD
0.62%
SK HOLDINGS
0.60%
KB FGI
0.58%
TELECOM ITALIA
0.58%
KOREA ELEC POWER
0.56%
FNDF
SAMSUNG ELECTR
3.57%
SHELL PLC
2.75%
TOTALENERGIES SE
2.00%
BP
1.36%
GLENCORE PLC
1.29%
TOYOTA
1.12%
BHP GROUP LTD
1.07%
HSBC HOLDINGS
0.97%
CH1499059983
0.87%
MITSUBISHI
0.79%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
0.77%
RIO TINTO
0.73%
MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG
0.73%
NESTLE SA
0.73%
BANCO SANTANDER SA
0.72%
Frequently asked questions about IMFL and FNDF
How have the IMFL and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 22, 2026, IMFL is up 15.3% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 19.1%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMFL or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the IMFL ETF saw +$231M in flows, compared to +$931M for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMFL or FNDF?
Over the past year, IMFL had a volatility of 14.47%, while FNDF experienced 13.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMFL or FNDF?
As of May 22, 2026, IMFL holds $991.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $24.33 B.
What sectors do the IMFL and FNDF ETFs invest in?
IMFL leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Materials. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IMFL ETF and FNDF ETF?
IMFL top holdings include RWE ST, MAGNA INTERNATIONAL and ENEOS HOLDINGS INC. FNDF holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: IMFL or FNDF?
IMFL holds 1144 securities with 11.78% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 874 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.48%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
