Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IMCVvsULVMETF Comparison
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) belongs to the US Mid Cap Value segment. VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IMCV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, ULVM's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. IMCV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.25% for ULVM. IMCV is up 2.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$40M in YTD flows. ULVM performs better with 4.94% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMCV and ULVM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IMCV vs ULVM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMCV ULVM | -4.12%-2.76% | +1.73%+4.12% | +2.42%+4.94% | +19.01%+23.44% | +51.20%+66.52% | +51.04%+72.21% |
| Flows | IMCV ULVM | +$27M+$5M | +$47M+$19M | +$40M+$19M | +$231M+$54M | +$252M-$69M | +$314M-$413M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMCV ULVM | +11.85%+11.25% | +17.14%+17.01% | +14.66%+14.04% | +16.70%+15.71% |
| Max drawdown | IMCV ULVM | -5.65%-4.40% | -13.19%-13.34% | -18.64%-18.21% | -19.72%-19.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | IMCV ULVM | 14d14d | 43d46d | 269d232d | 602d717d |
IMCV | ULVM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $84.24 | $95.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $85.39 | $96.52 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IMCV | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IMCV | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.24 | $95.54 |
| 1D performance | -1.35% | -1.02% |
| AuM | $968.74 M | $234.06 M |
| E/R | 0.06% | 0.25% |
IMCV | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index | Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index |
| N° of holdings | 256 | 118 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 28, 2004 | October 24, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IMCV and ULVM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IMCV is up 2.42% year-to-date (YTD), while ULVM has returned 4.94%. That puts ULVM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMCV or ULVM?
Year-to-date, the IMCV ETF saw +$40M in flows, compared to +$19M for ULVM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMCV or ULVM?
Over the past year, IMCV had a volatility of 17.14%, while ULVM experienced 17.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMCV or ULVM?
As of March 12, 2026, IMCV holds $968.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while ULVM manages $234.06 M.
What sectors do the IMCV and ULVM ETFs invest in?
IMCV leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, ULVM focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IMCV ETF and ULVM ETF?
IMCV top holdings include NEWMONT CORP, PNC FINL SVC and US. ULVM holds in its top three: CENTERPOINT ENERGY, REALTY INCOME REIT and AMEREN.
Which ETF is more diversified: IMCV or ULVM?
IMCV holds 275 securities with 17.13% of its assets in the top 15. ULVM has 121 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.39%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
