Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IMCGvsVOTETF Comparison
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. IMCG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.05% for VOT. IMCG is down -0.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$50M in YTD flows. VOT performs worse with -5.7% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMCG and VOT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IMCG vs VOT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMCG VOT | -3.85%-3.70% | -1.28%-6.49% | -0.58%-5.70% | +14.75%+11.52% | +48.65%+45.65% | +28.82%+24.66% |
| Flows | IMCG VOT | +$12M-$130M | +$54M+$97M | +$50M+$3M | +$432M+$911M | +$1.11B+$3.06B | +$1.05B+$4.07B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMCG VOT | +16.85%+16.90% | +20.28%+21.02% | +17.04%+17.56% | +20.12%+21.26% |
| Max drawdown | IMCG VOT | -6.28%-8.88% | -14.57%-14.79% | -21.86%-21.65% | -35.09%-37.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | IMCG VOT | 15d66d | 43d37d | 206d133d | 1060d1087d |
IMCG | VOT | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $79.40 | $263.21 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $79.42 | $263.55 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IMCG | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IMCG | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $79.40 | $263.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -0.13% |
| AuM | $3.12 B | $16.86 B |
| E/R | 0.06% | 0.05% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IMCG and VOT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, IMCG is down -0.58% year-to-date (YTD), while VOT has lost -5.7%. That puts IMCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMCG or VOT?
Year-to-date, the IMCG ETF saw +$50M in flows, compared to +$3M for VOT.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMCG or VOT?
Over the past year, IMCG had a volatility of 20.28%, while VOT experienced 21.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMCG or VOT?
As of March 13, 2026, IMCG holds $3.12 B in assets under management (AUM), while VOT manages $16.86 B.
What sectors do the IMCG and VOT ETFs invest in?
IMCG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, VOT focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IMCG ETF and VOT ETF?
IMCG top holdings include SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. VOT holds in its top three: CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP, SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC and HOWMET AEROSPACE INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: IMCG or VOT?
IMCG holds 269 securities with 16.93% of its assets in the top 15. VOT has 119 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.9%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
