IMCGvsCWSETF Comparison
VS
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IMCG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, CWS's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. IMCG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.79% for CWS. IMCG is up 13.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$407M in YTD flows. CWS performs worse with -2.64% YTD performance, and -$65M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMCG and CWS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IMCG vs CWS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/06/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMCG CWS | -7.27%-1.61% | -7.44%-7.79% | +13.47%-2.64% | +12.95%-0.39% | +64.69%+31.59% | +24.09%+35.55% |
| Flows | IMCG CWS | +$43M-$8M | +$164M-$12M | +$407M-$65M | +$444M-$68M | +$1.30B+$9M | +$1.81B+$49M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMCG CWS | +17.14%+13.25% | +18.10%+13.72% | +17.78%+13.87% | +20.66%+15.90% |
| Max drawdown | IMCG CWS | -10.49%-9.63% | -10.49%-11.94% | -21.86%-16.20% | -35.09%-23.63% |
| Max drawdown duration | IMCG CWS | 85d81d | 85d196d | 206d404d | 1060d532d |
Trading data
IMCG | CWS | |
Last sale 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM | $90.18 | $66.85 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $89.73 | $67.03 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIMCG | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
IMCG | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $90.18 | $66.85 |
| 1D performance | +0.50% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $3.90 B | $110.65 M |
| E/R | 0.06% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
IMCG | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | AdvisorShares |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 257 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 28, 2004 | September 20, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IMCG
USA
94.95%
Other
5.05%
CWS
USA
99.88%
Other
0.12%
Sectors
IMCG
Technology
26.04%
Industrials
20.68%
Finance
14.1%
Healthcare
8.6%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.7%
Other
22.87%
CWS
Healthcare
28.08%
Industrials
27.18%
Technology
13.93%
Business Services
7.53%
Other
23.28%
Advertisement
Diversification
IMCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.47%
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.21%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
IMCG
Snowflake, Inc.
1.59%
Cloudflare, Inc.
1.54%
Fortinet, Inc.
1.54%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
1.50%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
1.39%
Datadog, Inc.
1.26%
Johnson Controls International Plc
1.25%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
1.21%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
1.19%
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.10%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.02%
Cummins, Inc.
0.98%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
0.97%
Ecolab, Inc.
0.96%
DoorDash, Inc.
0.96%
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.50%
IES Holdings, Inc.
6.11%
Science Applications International Corp.
5.38%
Amphenol Corp.
5.23%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
4.71%
McKesson Corp.
4.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.66%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.50%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.50%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.22%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
4.04%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.99%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.92%
Cencora, Inc.
3.90%
ResMed, Inc.
3.87%
Frequently asked questions about IMCG and CWS
How have the IMCG and CWS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 6, 2026, IMCG is up 13.47% year-to-date (YTD), while CWS has lost -2.64%. That puts IMCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMCG or CWS?
Year-to-date, the IMCG ETF saw +$407M in flows, compared to -$65M for CWS.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMCG or CWS?
Over the past year, IMCG had a volatility of 18.1%, while CWS experienced 13.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMCG or CWS?
As of November 6, 2026, IMCG holds $3.90 B in assets under management (AUM), while CWS manages $110.65 M.
What sectors do the IMCG and CWS ETFs invest in?
IMCG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, CWS focuses on Healthcare, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IMCG ETF and CWS ETF?
IMCG top holdings include Snowflake, Inc., Cloudflare, Inc. and Fortinet, Inc.. CWS holds in its top three: Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: IMCG or CWS?
IMCG holds 259 securities with 18.47% of its assets in the top 15. CWS has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 71.21%.
Advertisement
