Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IMCGvsBIBLETF Comparison
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Inspire 100 ESG ETF (BIBL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. IMCG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, BIBL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Real Estate. IMCG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.41% for BIBL. IMCG is down -0.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$50M in YTD flows. BIBL performs better with 7.07% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMCG and BIBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IMCG vs BIBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMCG BIBL | -3.85%-4.24% | -1.28%+4.41% | -0.58%+7.07% | +14.75%+28.13% | +48.65%+66.51% | +28.82%+55.21% |
| Flows | IMCG BIBL | +$12M+$2M | +$54M+$5M | +$50M+$5M | +$432M+$15M | +$1.11B-$45M | +$1.05B+$118M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMCG BIBL | +16.85%+17.58% | +20.28%+20.10% | +17.04%+16.99% | +20.12%+19.62% |
| Max drawdown | IMCG BIBL | -6.28%-4.94% | -14.57%-14.51% | -21.86%-20.33% | -35.09%-30.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | IMCG BIBL | 15d28d | 43d45d | 206d233d | 1060d812d |
IMCG | BIBL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $79.40 | $47.37 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $79.42 | $47.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IMCG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IMCG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $79.40 | $47.37 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | +0.15% |
| AuM | $3.12 B | $391.23 M |
| E/R | 0.06% | 0.41% |
IMCG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index | Inspire 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 245 | 98 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 28, 2004 | October 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IMCG and BIBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, IMCG is down -0.58% year-to-date (YTD), while BIBL has returned 7.07%. That puts BIBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMCG or BIBL?
Year-to-date, the IMCG ETF saw +$50M in flows, compared to +$5M for BIBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMCG or BIBL?
Over the past year, IMCG had a volatility of 20.28%, while BIBL experienced 20.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMCG or BIBL?
As of March 13, 2026, IMCG holds $3.12 B in assets under management (AUM), while BIBL manages $391.23 M.
What sectors do the IMCG and BIBL ETFs invest in?
IMCG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BIBL focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Real Estate.
What are the top holdings of the IMCG ETF and BIBL ETF?
IMCG top holdings include SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. BIBL holds in its top three: CATERPILLAR, KLA CORPORATION and ARISTA NETWORKS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IMCG or BIBL?
IMCG holds 269 securities with 16.93% of its assets in the top 15. BIBL has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.88%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
