IMCGvsBIBLETF Comparison
VS
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Finance. IMCG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.06%, versus 0.41% for BIBL. IMCG is up 19.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$336M in YTD flows. BIBL performs better with 22.12% YTD performance, and +$59M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMCG and BIBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IMCG vs BIBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/21/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMCG BIBL | -2.69%-1.95% | -2.10%-4.37% | +19.75%+22.12% | +15.78%+25.17% | +71.02%+80.18% | +40.75%+55.78% |
| Flows | IMCG BIBL | +$39M+$8M | -$536M+$14M | +$336M+$59M | +$343M+$81M | +$1.24B+$20M | +$1.74B+$117M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMCG BIBL | +13.83%+17.98% | +17.34%+17.86% | +17.70%+17.78% | +20.54%+20.25% |
| Max drawdown | IMCG BIBL | -7.04%-7.95% | -10.11%-9.07% | -21.86%-20.33% | -35.09%-30.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | IMCG BIBL | 39d83d | 43d56d | 206d233d | 1060d812d |
Trading data
IMCG | BIBL | |
Last sale 9/22/2026 at 7:23 PM | $95.53 | $54.89 |
| Previous close 09/21/2026 | $95.23 | $54.73 |
| Consolidated volume 09/21/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IMCG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/22/2026 at 7:23 PM
Live
Closed
IMCG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $95.53 | $54.89 |
| 1D performance | +0.32% | +0.28% |
| AuM | $4.05 B | $495.49 M |
| E/R | 0.06% | 0.41% |
Characteristics
IMCG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index | Inspire 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 259 | 99 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 28, 2004 | October 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IMCG
USA
94.77%
Other
5.23%
BIBL
USA
99.49%
Other
0.51%
Sectors
IMCG
Technology
23.45%
Industrials
21.48%
Finance
14.93%
Non-Energy Materi.
8%
Healthcare
7.61%
Other
24.53%
BIBL
Technology
31.93%
Industrials
21.44%
Finance
19.83%
Energy
7.57%
Other
19.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
IMCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.94%
BIBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IMCG
Snowflake, Inc.
1.38%
Fortinet, Inc.
1.31%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
1.24%
Cloudflare, Inc.
1.23%
Johnson Controls International Plc
1.20%
Cummins, Inc.
1.19%
Datadog, Inc.
1.14%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
1.11%
Royal Caribbean Group
1.10%
Aon Plc
1.08%
DoorDash, Inc.
1.02%
Moody's Corp.
1.00%
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
0.98%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
0.98%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
0.98%
BIBL
Caterpillar, Inc.
7.57%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.16%
KLA Corp.
4.64%
Amphenol Corp.
4.08%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.65%
Welltower, Inc.
3.57%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
2.69%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.67%
The Progressive Corp.
2.65%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.32%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
2.00%
SLB Ltd.
1.98%
Cintas Corp.
1.95%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
1.93%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
1.65%
Frequently asked questions about IMCG and BIBL
How have the IMCG and BIBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 21, 2026, IMCG is up 19.75% year-to-date (YTD), while BIBL has returned 22.12%. That puts BIBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMCG or BIBL?
Year-to-date, the IMCG ETF saw +$336M in flows, compared to +$59M for BIBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMCG or BIBL?
Over the past year, IMCG had a volatility of 17.34%, while BIBL experienced 17.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMCG or BIBL?
As of September 21, 2026, IMCG holds $4.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while BIBL manages $495.49 M.
What sectors do the IMCG and BIBL ETFs invest in?
IMCG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, BIBL focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the IMCG ETF and BIBL ETF?
IMCG top holdings include Snowflake, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. and Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.. BIBL holds in its top three: Caterpillar, Inc., Arista Networks, Inc. and KLA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: IMCG or BIBL?
IMCG holds 261 securities with 16.94% of its assets in the top 15. BIBL has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.51%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
