Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IMCBvsVOETF Comparison
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. IMCB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.03% for VO. IMCB is up 2.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. VO performs worse with 1.39% YTD performance, and +$1.80B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMCB and VO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IMCB vs VO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMCB VO | -3.13%-2.83% | +0.98%-0.68% | +2.81%+1.39% | +17.92%+17.03% | +53.12%+52.52% | +45.88%+42.50% |
| Flows | IMCB VO | +$5M+$1.13B | +$38M+$2.98B | +$17M+$1.80B | +$302M+$10.72B | +$399M+$19.23B | +$286M+$28.98B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMCB VO | +12.95%+12.81% | +18.18%+17.64% | +15.32%+14.86% | +17.65%+17.55% |
| Max drawdown | IMCB VO | -4.23%-4.18% | -13.82%-13.44% | -19.88%-18.93% | -25.13%-27.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | IMCB VO | 13d13d | 46d46d | 238d211d | 835d972d |
IMCB | VO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:32 PM | $84.30 | $291.89 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $84.97 | $294.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IMCB | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IMCB | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.30 | $291.89 |
| 1D performance | -0.79% | -0.79% |
| AuM | $1.45 B | $93.78 B |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.03% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IMCB and VO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IMCB is up 2.81% year-to-date (YTD), while VO has returned 1.39%. That puts IMCB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMCB or VO?
Year-to-date, the IMCB ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to +$1.80B for VO.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMCB or VO?
Over the past year, IMCB had a volatility of 18.18%, while VO experienced 17.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMCB or VO?
As of March 11, 2026, IMCB holds $1.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while VO manages $93.78 B.
What sectors do the IMCB and VO ETFs invest in?
IMCB leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, VO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IMCB ETF and VO ETF?
IMCB top holdings include NEWMONT CORP, WESTERN DIGITAL and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. VO holds in its top three: NEWMONT CORP, CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP and SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: IMCB or VO?
IMCB holds 403 securities with 9.81% of its assets in the top 15. VO has 287 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.18%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
