Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IMCBvsSIZEETF Comparison
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) is part of the US Large Cap segment. IMCB's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, SIZE's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. IMCB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.15% for SIZE. IMCB is up 3.09% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. SIZE performs worse with 1.05% YTD performance, and -$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMCB and SIZE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IMCB vs SIZE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMCB SIZE | -2.64%-3.29% | +2.03%+0.33% | +3.09%+1.05% | +17.19%+14.04% | +51.89%+50.90% | +48.05%+48.31% |
| Flows | IMCB SIZE | +$5M-$8M | +$38M+$8M | +$17M-$8M | +$302M+$29M | +$399M-$47M | +$286M-$670M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMCB SIZE | +13.02%+12.14% | +18.20%+17.53% | +15.33%+14.74% | +17.66%+17.04% |
| Max drawdown | IMCB SIZE | -3.97%-3.59% | -13.82%-13.31% | -19.88%-18.57% | -25.13%-24.05% |
| Max drawdown duration | IMCB SIZE | 12d12d | 46d46d | 238d219d | 835d820d |
IMCB | SIZE | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $84.97 | $162.80 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $85.22 | $163.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IMCB | SIZE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IMCB | SIZE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.97 | $162.80 |
| 1D performance | -0.29% | -0.30% |
| AuM | $1.46 B | $383.84 M |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IMCB and SIZE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, IMCB is up 3.09% year-to-date (YTD), while SIZE has returned 1.05%. That puts IMCB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMCB or SIZE?
Year-to-date, the IMCB ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to -$8M for SIZE.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMCB or SIZE?
Over the past year, IMCB had a volatility of 18.2%, while SIZE experienced 17.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMCB or SIZE?
As of March 10, 2026, IMCB holds $1.46 B in assets under management (AUM), while SIZE manages $383.84 M.
What sectors do the IMCB and SIZE ETFs invest in?
IMCB leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, SIZE focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IMCB ETF and SIZE ETF?
IMCB top holdings include NEWMONT CORP, WESTERN DIGITAL and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. SIZE holds in its top three: US7731211089, ECHOSTAR and WESTERN DIGITAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: IMCB or SIZE?
IMCB holds 403 securities with 9.81% of its assets in the top 15. SIZE has 544 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.05%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
