Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IMCBvsGSEWETF Comparison
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is part of the US Large Cap segment. IMCB's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, GSEW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. IMCB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.09% for GSEW. IMCB is up 0.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. GSEW performs better with 1.97% YTD performance, and +$71M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IMCB and GSEW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IMCB vs GSEW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IMCB GSEW | -4.63%-2.47% | +0.11%+0.37% | +0.92%+1.97% | +17.55%+16.99% | +50.32%+58.43% | +40.82%+52.21% |
| Flows | IMCB GSEW | +$5M+$45M | +$26M+$118M | +$17M+$71M | +$302M+$299M | +$399M+$812M | +$286M+$716M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IMCB GSEW | +13.35%+12.44% | +18.22%+17.69% | +15.33%+14.48% | +17.66%+16.96% |
| Max drawdown | IMCB GSEW | -5.99%-3.47% | -13.82%-13.46% | -19.88%-18.23% | -25.13%-25.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | IMCB GSEW | 15d13d | 46d46d | 238d211d | 835d834d |
IMCB | GSEW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $83.47 | $85.14 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $83.45 | $85.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IMCB | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IMCB | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $83.47 | $85.14 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $1.43 B | $1.60 B |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.09% |
IMCB | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index | Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index |
| N° of holdings | 371 | 469 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 28, 2004 | December 9, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IMCB and GSEW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, IMCB is up 0.92% year-to-date (YTD), while GSEW has returned 1.97%. That puts GSEW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IMCB or GSEW?
Year-to-date, the IMCB ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to +$71M for GSEW.
Which ETF is more volatile: IMCB or GSEW?
Over the past year, IMCB had a volatility of 18.22%, while GSEW experienced 17.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: IMCB or GSEW?
As of March 13, 2026, IMCB holds $1.43 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSEW manages $1.60 B.
What sectors do the IMCB and GSEW ETFs invest in?
IMCB leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, GSEW focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IMCB ETF and GSEW ETF?
IMCB top holdings include NEWMONT CORP, WESTERN DIGITAL and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. GSEW holds in its top three: US92333F1012, US80004C2008 and BLOOM ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: IMCB or GSEW?
IMCB holds 403 securities with 9.81% of its assets in the top 15. GSEW has 497 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
