ILITvsNUKZETF Comparison
VS
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF (ILIT) and Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ILIT's top 2 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials and Non-Corporate. In contrast, NUKZ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. ILIT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.85% for NUKZ. ILIT is down -3.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. NUKZ performs better with 2.96% YTD performance, and +$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ILIT and NUKZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ILIT vs NUKZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ILIT NUKZ | +5.23%-1.95% | -22.67%-9.48% | -3.62%+2.96% | +51.10%+14.22% | -19.61%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | ILIT NUKZ | --$28M | -$4M-$52M | +$2M+$9M | +$7M+$197M | +$11M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ILIT NUKZ | +41.58%+26.68% | +44.43%+27.69% | +38.65%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | ILIT NUKZ | -32.65%-15.76% | -43.33%-19.49% | -65.94%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ILIT NUKZ | 81d92d | 121d121d | 869dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
ILIT | NUKZ | |
Last sale 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM | $14.76 | $67.03 |
| Previous close 09/04/2026 | $14.91 | $65.70 |
| Consolidated volume 09/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ILIT | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ILIT | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $14.76 | $67.03 |
| 1D performance | -1.06% | +2.02% |
| AuM | $14.96 M | $749.81 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
ILIT | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index | VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2023 | January 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ILIT
China
39.17%
Australia
22.91%
USA
9.87%
Chile
9.29%
Other
18.76%
NUKZ
USA
52.97%
Canada
10.23%
Republic of Korea
9.61%
Japan
7.51%
Other
19.69%
Sectors
ILIT
Non-Energy Materi.
99.78%
Other
0.22%
NUKZ
Industrials
50.7%
Utilities
33.39%
Energy
9.01%
Other
6.9%
Advertisement
Diversification
ILIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
75.41%
NUKZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ILIT
Mineral Resources Ltd.
9.71%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
9.29%
Albemarle Corp.
8.09%
PLS Group Ltd.
7.76%
Liontown Ltd.
5.44%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
4.34%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.05%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
4.04%
Lithium Americas Corp.
4.03%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
3.91%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
3.61%
Cosmo AM&T Co., Ltd.
2.94%
Hunan Yuneng New Energy Battery Material Co., Ltd.
2.92%
Yunnan Energy New Material (Group) Co., Ltd.
2.81%
Shenzhen Capchem Technology Co., Ltd.
2.48%
NUKZ
Cameco Corp.
7.86%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.85%
Endesa SA
3.76%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
3.73%
CEZ as
3.58%
Dominion Energy, Inc.
3.40%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.34%
Talen Energy Corp.
3.19%
PG&E Corp.
2.97%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.94%
Emerson Electric Co.
2.91%
Fortum Oyj
2.88%
Vistra Corp.
2.87%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.75%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.73%
Frequently asked questions about ILIT and NUKZ
How have the ILIT and NUKZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 4, 2026, ILIT is down -3.62% year-to-date (YTD), while NUKZ has returned 2.96%. That puts NUKZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ILIT or NUKZ?
Year-to-date, the ILIT ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$9M for NUKZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: ILIT or NUKZ?
Over the past year, ILIT had a volatility of 44.43%, while NUKZ experienced 27.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: ILIT or NUKZ?
As of September 4, 2026, ILIT holds $14.96 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUKZ manages $749.81 M.
What sectors do the ILIT and NUKZ ETFs invest in?
ILIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, NUKZ focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the ILIT ETF and NUKZ ETF?
ILIT top holdings include Mineral Resources Ltd., Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA and Albemarle Corp.. NUKZ holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., GE Vernova, Inc. and Endesa SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ILIT or NUKZ?
ILIT holds 35 securities with 75.41% of its assets in the top 15. NUKZ has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.77%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ILIT & NUKZ
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
ILIT
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
February 6, 2024
NUKZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
