Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ILCGvsAGRWETF Comparison
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. ILCG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.35% for AGRW. ILCG is down -5.57% year-to-date (YTD) with -$45M in YTD flows. AGRW performs better with -4.31% YTD performance, and -$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ILCG and AGRW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ILCG vs AGRW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ILCG AGRW | -2.21%-0.96% | -4.34%-5.72% | -5.57%-4.31% | +22.11%n/a | +95.61%n/a | +73.38%n/a |
| Flows | ILCG AGRW | -$51M- | -$51M-$24M | -$45M-$24M | +$36M- | -$88M- | -$213M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ILCG AGRW | +17.19%+15.85% | +22.79%n/a | +19.23%n/a | +22.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ILCG AGRW | -7.29%-7.51% | -15.63%n/a | -23.24%n/a | -35.44%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ILCG AGRW | 44d63d | 45dn/a | 151dn/a | 807dn/a |
ILCG | AGRW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $98.19 | $27.96 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $99.25 | $28.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ILCG | AGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ILCG | AGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $98.19 | $27.96 |
| 1D performance | -1.07% | -1.43% |
| AuM | $2.73 B | $100.64 M |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ILCG and AGRW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, ILCG is down -5.57% year-to-date (YTD), while AGRW has lost -4.31%. That puts AGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ILCG or AGRW?
Year-to-date, the ILCG ETF saw -$45M in flows, compared to -$24M for AGRW.
Which ETF is bigger: ILCG or AGRW?
As of March 13, 2026, ILCG holds $2.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while AGRW manages $100.64 M.
What sectors do the ILCG and AGRW ETFs invest in?
ILCG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, AGRW focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ILCG ETF and AGRW ETF?
ILCG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and META PLATFORMS. AGRW holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: ILCG or AGRW?
ILCG holds 330 securities with 62% of its assets in the top 15. AGRW has 43 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.72%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
