Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IJKvsQMIDETF Comparison
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IJK's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, QMID's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology. IJK is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.17%, versus 0.38% for QMID. IJK is up 3.1% year-to-date (YTD) with -$63M in YTD flows. QMID performs worse with -3.25% YTD performance, and +$706K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IJK and QMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IJK vs QMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IJK QMID | -4.28%-5.28% | +2.38%-5.14% | +3.10%-3.25% | +23.38%+12.38% | +50.21%n/a | +30.00%n/a |
| Flows | IJK QMID | +$71M+$706K | -$75M+$706K | -$63M+$706K | -$700M+$710K | -$779M- | -$883M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IJK QMID | +18.16%+14.43% | +22.05%+20.54% | +18.50%n/a | +20.52%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IJK QMID | -7.51%-7.29% | -15.02%-13.86% | -25.48%n/a | -29.27%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IJK QMID | 11d50d | 46d46d | 379dn/a | 834dn/a |
IJK | QMID | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $99.95 | $27.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $100.14 | $27.33 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IJK | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IJK | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $99.95 | $27.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $9.35 B | $2.05 M |
| E/R | 0.17% | 0.38% |
IJK | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 228 | 120 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 24, 2000 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IJK and QMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, IJK is up 3.1% year-to-date (YTD), while QMID has lost -3.25%. That puts IJK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IJK or QMID?
Year-to-date, the IJK ETF saw -$63M in flows, compared to +$706K for QMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: IJK or QMID?
Over the past year, IJK had a volatility of 22.05%, while QMID experienced 20.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: IJK or QMID?
As of March 13, 2026, IJK holds $9.35 B in assets under management (AUM), while QMID manages $2.05 M.
What sectors do the IJK and QMID ETFs invest in?
IJK leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, QMID focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IJK ETF and QMID ETF?
IJK top holdings include CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS. QMID holds in its top three: US65290E1010, ATI INC and COEUR MINING INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: IJK or QMID?
IJK holds 238 securities with 20.49% of its assets in the top 15. QMID has 125 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.78%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
