Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IJKvsMCOWETF Comparison
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IJK's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, MCOW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. IJK is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.17%, versus 0.49% for MCOW. IJK is up 3.34% year-to-date (YTD) with -$103M in YTD flows. MCOW performs worse with -7.06% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IJK and MCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IJK vs MCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IJK MCOW | -3.04%-5.89% | +2.29%-8.89% | +3.34%-7.06% | +21.18%n/a | +50.56%n/a | +32.48%n/a |
| Flows | IJK MCOW | +$31M- | -$115M- | -$103M- | -$748M- | -$819M- | -$923M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IJK MCOW | +18.17%+16.60% | +22.15%n/a | +18.51%n/a | +20.53%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IJK MCOW | -7.29%-11.28% | -15.02%n/a | -25.48%n/a | -29.27%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IJK MCOW | 10d49d | 46dn/a | 379dn/a | 834dn/a |
IJK | MCOW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:58 PM | $99.55 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $100.14 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IJK | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IJK | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $99.55 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.59% | – |
| AuM | $9.33 B | $0.91 M |
| E/R | 0.17% | 0.49% |
IJK | MCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 228 | 78 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 24, 2000 | August 27, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IJK and MCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IJK is up 3.34% year-to-date (YTD), while MCOW has lost -7.06%. That puts IJK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IJK or MCOW?
Year-to-date, the IJK ETF saw -$103M in flows, compared to - for MCOW.
Which ETF is bigger: IJK or MCOW?
As of March 12, 2026, IJK holds $9.33 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCOW manages $0.91 M.
What sectors do the IJK and MCOW ETFs invest in?
IJK leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, MCOW focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IJK ETF and MCOW ETF?
IJK top holdings include CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS. MCOW holds in its top three: PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and RAMBUS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IJK or MCOW?
IJK holds 238 securities with 20.49% of its assets in the top 15. MCOW has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.93%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
