Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IHFvsTMEDETF Comparison
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) belong to the same industry segment: US Health Care. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. IHF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.44% for TMED. IHF is down -7.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$19M in YTD flows. TMED performs better with 0.13% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IHF and TMED below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IHF vs TMED performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IHF TMED | -3.00%+1.16% | -9.66%+1.57% | -7.95%+0.13% | -12.82%n/a | -6.63%n/a | -6.51%n/a |
| Flows | IHF TMED | -$2M+$1M | +$5M+$4M | +$19M+$3M | +$94M- | -$484M- | -$353M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IHF TMED | +25.28%+16.57% | +24.09%n/a | +19.04%n/a | +18.81%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IHF TMED | -12.35%-7.14% | -25.18%n/a | -29.86%n/a | -29.86%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IHF TMED | 64d47d | 332dn/a | 554dn/a | 554dn/a |
IHF | TMED | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $44.15 | $29.57 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $44.13 | $29.70 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IHF | TMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IHF | TMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.15 | $29.57 |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | -0.42% |
| AuM | $699.61 M | $19.32 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.44% |
IHF | TMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | T. Rowe Price |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 54 | 74 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 1, 2006 | June 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IHF and TMED ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IHF is down -7.95% year-to-date (YTD), while TMED has returned 0.13%. That puts TMED better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IHF or TMED?
Year-to-date, the IHF ETF saw +$19M in flows, compared to +$3M for TMED.
Which ETF is bigger: IHF or TMED?
As of March 11, 2026, IHF holds $699.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while TMED manages $19.32 M.
What sectors do the IHF and TMED ETFs invest in?
IHF leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, TMED focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IHF ETF and TMED ETF?
IHF top holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, CVS HEALTH CORP and ELEVANCE HEALTH INC. TMED holds in its top three: LILLY, UNITEDHEALTH GRP and GILEAD SCIENCES.
Which ETF is more diversified: IHF or TMED?
IHF holds 63 securities with 82.41% of its assets in the top 15. TMED has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.46%.
Healthcare Stocks Drop on Medicare Payment Rate Surprise
Investing in the Aging Demographics Megatrend
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
