Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IHFvsRSPHETF Comparison
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) belong to the same industry segment: US Health Care. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. IHF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.4% for RSPH. IHF is down -7.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$19M in YTD flows. RSPH performs better with -1.52% YTD performance, and -$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IHF and RSPH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IHF vs RSPH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IHF RSPH | -3.00%-3.99% | -9.66%-1.89% | -7.95%-1.52% | -12.82%+5.46% | -6.63%+14.57% | -6.51%+23.56% |
| Flows | IHF RSPH | -$2M-$7M | +$5M-$13M | +$19M-$10M | +$94M-$107M | -$484M-$318M | -$353M-$177M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IHF RSPH | +25.28%+14.30% | +24.09%+18.40% | +19.04%+14.74% | +18.81%+16.12% |
| Max drawdown | IHF RSPH | -12.35%-5.86% | -25.18%-10.79% | -29.86%-17.06% | -29.86%-21.91% |
| Max drawdown duration | IHF RSPH | 64d10d | 332d197d | 554d192d | 554d817d |
IHF | RSPH | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.15 | $31.33 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $44.13 | $31.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IHF | RSPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IHF | RSPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.15 | $31.33 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | +0.03% |
| AuM | $699.61 M | $730.48 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.4% |
IHF | RSPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index | S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care Index |
| N° of holdings | 54 | 57 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 1, 2006 | November 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IHF and RSPH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IHF is down -7.95% year-to-date (YTD), while RSPH has lost -1.52%. That puts RSPH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IHF or RSPH?
Year-to-date, the IHF ETF saw +$19M in flows, compared to -$10M for RSPH.
Which ETF is more volatile: IHF or RSPH?
Over the past year, IHF had a volatility of 24.09%, while RSPH experienced 18.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: IHF or RSPH?
As of March 11, 2026, IHF holds $699.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while RSPH manages $730.48 M.
What sectors do the IHF and RSPH ETFs invest in?
IHF leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, RSPH focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IHF ETF and RSPH ETF?
IHF top holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, CVS HEALTH CORP and ELEVANCE HEALTH INC. RSPH holds in its top three: MODERNA INC, MOLINA HLTHCRE and CENTENE.
Which ETF is more diversified: IHF or RSPH?
IHF holds 63 securities with 82.41% of its assets in the top 15. RSPH has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.75%.
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Equal-Weight ETFs
Healthcare Stocks Drop on Medicare Payment Rate Surprise
Investing in the Aging Demographics Megatrend
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
