Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IHFvsFHLCETF Comparison
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Health Care. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. IHF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.08% for FHLC. IHF is down -7.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$19M in YTD flows. FHLC performs better with -1.48% YTD performance, and +$111M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IHF and FHLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IHF vs FHLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IHF FHLC | -3.00%-1.39% | -9.66%+0.15% | -7.95%-1.48% | -12.82%+7.42% | -6.63%+29.92% | -6.51%+35.91% |
| Flows | IHF FHLC | -$2M+$34M | +$5M+$130M | +$19M+$111M | +$94M-$10M | -$484M-$619M | -$353M-$230M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IHF FHLC | +25.28%+13.18% | +24.09%+17.31% | +19.04%+13.68% | +18.81%+14.81% |
| Max drawdown | IHF FHLC | -12.35%-5.00% | -25.18%-11.86% | -29.86%-16.88% | -29.86%-17.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | IHF FHLC | 64d62d | 332d190d | 554d435d | 554d762d |
IHF | FHLC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.15 | $73.01 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $44.13 | $73.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IHF | FHLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IHF | FHLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.15 | $73.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | -0.22% |
| AuM | $699.61 M | $2.91 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.08% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IHF and FHLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IHF is down -7.95% year-to-date (YTD), while FHLC has lost -1.48%. That puts FHLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IHF or FHLC?
Year-to-date, the IHF ETF saw +$19M in flows, compared to +$111M for FHLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: IHF or FHLC?
Over the past year, IHF had a volatility of 24.09%, while FHLC experienced 17.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: IHF or FHLC?
As of March 11, 2026, IHF holds $699.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while FHLC manages $2.91 B.
What sectors do the IHF and FHLC ETFs invest in?
IHF leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, FHLC focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IHF ETF and FHLC ETF?
IHF top holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, CVS HEALTH CORP and ELEVANCE HEALTH INC. FHLC holds in its top three: LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and ABBVIE.
Which ETF is more diversified: IHF or FHLC?
IHF holds 63 securities with 82.41% of its assets in the top 15. FHLC has 328 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.98%.
Healthcare Stocks Drop on Medicare Payment Rate Surprise
Investing in the Aging Demographics Megatrend
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
