Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IGTRvsGSIDETF Comparison
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. IGTR's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, GSID's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. IGTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.25% for GSID. IGTR is up 0.51% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. GSID performs better with 3.03% YTD performance, and -$80M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGTR and GSID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IGTR vs GSID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGTR GSID | -5.82%-5.31% | +1.90%+4.36% | +0.51%+3.03% | +21.41%+25.11% | +40.96%+58.79% | n/a+51.18% |
| Flows | IGTR GSID | -- | -$4M-$87M | -$4M-$80M | -$48M-$100M | -$270M+$218M | -+$321M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGTR GSID | +15.05%+14.35% | +17.82%+16.12% | +16.51%+13.78% | n/a+15.13% |
| Max drawdown | IGTR GSID | -8.79%-8.10% | -9.71%-14.37% | -20.02%-14.37% | n/a-29.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | IGTR GSID | 12d10d | 44d42d | 465d42d | n/a897d |
IGTR | GSID | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.19 | $69.58 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.55 | $70.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IGTR | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IGTR | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.19 | $69.58 |
| 1D performance | -1.26% | -1.40% |
| AuM | $53.98 M | $907.97 M |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.25% |
IGTR | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Innovator | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 160 | 841 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 17, 2022 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IGTR and GSID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, IGTR is up 0.51% year-to-date (YTD), while GSID has returned 3.03%. That puts GSID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGTR or GSID?
Year-to-date, the IGTR ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to -$80M for GSID.
Which ETF is more volatile: IGTR or GSID?
Over the past year, IGTR had a volatility of 17.82%, while GSID experienced 16.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: IGTR or GSID?
As of March 13, 2026, IGTR holds $53.98 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSID manages $907.97 M.
What sectors do the IGTR and GSID ETFs invest in?
IGTR leans toward sectors like Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, GSID focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IGTR ETF and GSID ETF?
IGTR top holdings include ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS, HSBC HOLDINGS and SIEMENS ENERGY AG. GSID holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IGTR or GSID?
IGTR holds 168 securities with 33.72% of its assets in the top 15. GSID has 889 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.33%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
