Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IGPTvsGLBLETF Comparison
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. IGPT's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. In contrast, GLBL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IGPT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.65% for GLBL. IGPT is up 5.31% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. GLBL performs worse with -2.43% YTD performance, and +$1K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGPT and GLBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IGPT vs GLBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGPT GLBL | -0.36%-2.22% | +5.38%-3.71% | +5.31%-2.43% | +51.91%+23.82% | +105.19%n/a | +20.63%n/a |
| Flows | IGPT GLBL | +$4M+$1K | +$17M+$1K | +$17M+$1K | +$95M+$1K | +$275M- | -$25M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGPT GLBL | +26.34%+12.77% | +29.45%+17.96% | +24.60%n/a | +26.44%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IGPT GLBL | -9.31%-5.09% | -20.14%-13.57% | -29.38%n/a | -46.76%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IGPT GLBL | 41d58d | 45d45d | 370dn/a | 1605dn/a |
IGPT | GLBL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 4:24 PM | $61.32 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $62.80 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IGPT | GLBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IGPT | GLBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.32 | – |
| 1D performance | -2.36% | – |
| AuM | $704.27 M | $0.98 M |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.65% |
IGPT | GLBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development | MSCI World Ricardo Comparative Advantage Select GDP Tilted Index |
| N° of holdings | 87 | 347 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2005 | September 16, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IGPT and GLBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IGPT is up 5.31% year-to-date (YTD), while GLBL has lost -2.43%. That puts IGPT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGPT or GLBL?
Year-to-date, the IGPT ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to +$1K for GLBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: IGPT or GLBL?
Over the past year, IGPT had a volatility of 29.45%, while GLBL experienced 17.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: IGPT or GLBL?
As of March 11, 2026, IGPT holds $704.27 M in assets under management (AUM), while GLBL manages $0.98 M.
What sectors do the IGPT and GLBL ETFs invest in?
IGPT leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Communication Services. Meanwhile, GLBL focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IGPT ETF and GLBL ETF?
IGPT top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES and ALPHABET INC-CL. GLBL holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, AMAZON.COM INC and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: IGPT or GLBL?
IGPT holds 98 securities with 72.46% of its assets in the top 15. GLBL has 371 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
