IGHGvsCLSEETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Investment Grade Interest Rate Hedged ETF (IGHG) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. IGHG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 1.52% for CLSE. IGHG is up 1.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$121M in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 23.39% YTD performance, and +$659M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGHG and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IGHG vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGHG CLSE | -0.47%-1.22% | -0.27%+0.02% | +1.82%+23.39% | +3.01%+32.16% | +20.99%+108.86% | +28.63%n/a |
| Flows | IGHG CLSE | +$23M+$87M | +$74M+$266M | +$121M+$659M | +$129M+$692M | +$100M+$847M | -$565M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGHG CLSE | +2.04%+8.79% | +1.96%+13.01% | +2.50%+13.47% | +3.24%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IGHG CLSE | -0.81%-3.12% | -1.58%-4.60% | -3.40%-15.76% | -8.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IGHG CLSE | 46d43d | 66d40d | 82d188d | 462dn/a |
Trading data
IGHG | CLSE | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $77.61 | $33.74 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $77.67 | $34.05 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CLSE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIGHG | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IGHG | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $77.61 | $33.74 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | -0.91% |
| AuM | $395.04 M | $1.02 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 1.52% |
Characteristics
IGHG | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | ProShares | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | FTSE Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Bonds | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 5, 2013 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IGHG
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Sectors
IGHG
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
IGHG
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
IGHG
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about IGHG and CLSE
How have the IGHG and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IGHG is up 1.82% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 23.39%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGHG or CLSE?
Year-to-date, the IGHG ETF saw +$121M in flows, compared to +$659M for CLSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: IGHG or CLSE?
Over the past year, IGHG had a volatility of 1.96%, while CLSE experienced 13.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: IGHG or CLSE?
As of October 16, 2026, IGHG holds $395.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $1.02 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
