IGBHvsFTLSETF Comparison
ETF 1
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
VS
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. IGBH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 1.38% for FTLS. IGBH is up 3.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$134M in YTD flows. FTLS performs better with 9.5% YTD performance, and +$289M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGBH and FTLS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IGBH vs FTLS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGBH FTLS | +0.20%+1.75% | +1.78%+3.63% | +3.68%+9.50% | +5.63%+13.00% | +25.01%+49.71% | +30.43%+65.37% |
| Flows | IGBH FTLS | +$37M+$77M | +$72M+$107M | +$134M+$289M | +$150M+$398M | +$213M+$1.32B | -$503M+$1.61B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGBH FTLS | +2.81%+5.74% | +3.74%+7.14% | +4.67%+8.66% | +5.84%+9.37% |
| Max drawdown | IGBH FTLS | -0.72%-1.19% | -4.03%-3.80% | -6.74%-11.43% | -10.28%-11.43% |
| Max drawdown duration | IGBH FTLS | 24d15d | 102d65d | 138d214d | 596d214d |
Trading data
IGBH | FTLS | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.53 | $76.86 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $24.60 | $77.23 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIGBH | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IGBH | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.53 | $76.86 |
| 1D performance | -0.28% | -0.48% |
| AuM | $273.64 M | $2.65 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 1.38% |
Characteristics
IGBH | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 22, 2015 | September 8, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IGBH
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Sectors
IGBH
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
IGBH
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
IGBH
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about IGBH and FTLS
How have the IGBH and FTLS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IGBH is up 3.68% year-to-date (YTD), while FTLS has returned 9.5%. That puts FTLS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGBH or FTLS?
Year-to-date, the IGBH ETF saw +$134M in flows, compared to +$289M for FTLS.
Which ETF is more volatile: IGBH or FTLS?
Over the past year, IGBH had a volatility of 3.74%, while FTLS experienced 7.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: IGBH or FTLS?
As of October 16, 2026, IGBH holds $273.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while FTLS manages $2.65 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
