Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IEFAvsGSIDETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) belongs to the DM Blended Cap segment. Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. IEFA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, GSID's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. IEFA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.07%, versus 0.25% for GSID. IEFA is up 3.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4.52B in YTD flows. GSID performs better with 3.72% YTD performance, and -$80M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IEFA and GSID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IEFA vs GSID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IEFA GSID | -5.55%-4.59% | +4.21%+6.13% | +3.37%+3.72% | +25.93%+24.71% | +60.05%+57.80% | +50.61%+53.49% |
| Flows | IEFA GSID | +$3.13B- | +$6.05B-$87M | +$4.52B-$80M | +$16.76B-$100M | +$33.48B+$218M | +$50.53B+$321M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IEFA GSID | +14.36%+14.40% | +15.94%+16.13% | +14.06%+13.80% | +15.69%+15.13% |
| Max drawdown | IEFA GSID | -6.65%-8.10% | -13.46%-14.37% | -13.46%-14.37% | -30.35%-29.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | IEFA GSID | 10d9d | 40d42d | 40d42d | 906d897d |
IEFA | GSID | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $92.37 | $71.57 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $92.60 | $71.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IEFA | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IEFA | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $92.37 | $71.57 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | -0.42% |
| AuM | $172.52 B | $914.09 M |
| E/R | 0.07% | 0.25% |
IEFA | GSID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE IMI Index | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 2428 | 841 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 18, 2012 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IEFA and GSID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IEFA is up 3.37% year-to-date (YTD), while GSID has returned 3.72%. That puts GSID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IEFA or GSID?
Year-to-date, the IEFA ETF saw +$4.52B in flows, compared to -$80M for GSID.
Which ETF is more volatile: IEFA or GSID?
Over the past year, IEFA had a volatility of 15.94%, while GSID experienced 16.13%.
Which ETF is bigger: IEFA or GSID?
As of March 11, 2026, IEFA holds $172.52 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSID manages $914.09 M.
What sectors do the IEFA and GSID ETFs invest in?
IEFA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSID focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IEFA ETF and GSID ETF?
IEFA top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS. GSID holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IEFA or GSID?
IEFA holds 2583 securities with 15.09% of its assets in the top 15. GSID has 889 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.33%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
