IDHQvsFNDFETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.5%
Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. IDHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. IDHQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. IDHQ is up 23.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$206M in YTD flows. FNDF performs worse with 16.99% YTD performance, and +$1.39B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IDHQ and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IDHQ vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IDHQ FNDF | +1.11%-2.64% | +10.04%+2.58% | +23.83%+16.99% | +35.49%+36.81% | +68.10%+77.62% | +59.44%+96.11% |
| Flows | IDHQ FNDF | +$37M+$372M | +$88M+$789M | +$206M+$1.39B | +$256M+$2.38B | +$492M+$5.29B | +$580M+$8.97B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IDHQ FNDF | +23.82%+14.56% | +19.60%+14.27% | +16.45%+14.05% | +16.76%+14.78% |
| Max drawdown | IDHQ FNDF | -4.02%-4.43% | -13.21%-10.49% | -15.06%-13.78% | -32.79%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | IDHQ FNDF | 9d44d | 69d65d | 227d44d | 911d545d |
Trading data
IDHQ | FNDF | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.05 | $52.74 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $43.16 | $52.83 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IDHQ | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IDHQ | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.05 | $52.74 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | -0.17% |
| AuM | $909.92 M | $24.22 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
IDHQ | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Quality Developed ex US LargeMidCap Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 193 | 857 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2007 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IDHQ
Japan
19.6%
Switzerland
15.32%
Republic of Korea
14.13%
United Kingdom
12.63%
Netherlands
9.39%
Other
28.92%
FNDF
Japan
22.6%
United Kingdom
12.93%
Republic of Korea
11.71%
Canada
8.55%
France
7.66%
Germany
7.35%
Other
29.2%
Sectors
IDHQ
Technology
32.59%
Industrials
21.4%
Finance
15.48%
Healthcare
12.04%
Other
18.49%
FNDF
Finance
17.9%
Technology
13.79%
Energy
12.67%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.61%
Industrials
11.45%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.51%
Other
23.08%
Advertisement
Diversification
IDHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.8%
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
IDHQ
SK hynix, Inc.
12.20%
ASML Holding NV
6.13%
Novartis AG
3.84%
Roche Holding AG
3.74%
Advantest Corp.
3.32%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
2.73%
ABB Ltd.
2.51%
Safran SA
2.43%
Allianz SE
2.39%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.27%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.92%
Unilever Plc
1.88%
GSK Plc
1.84%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.84%
Airbus SE
1.75%
FNDF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
5.34%
Shell Plc
2.29%
TotalEnergies SE
1.80%
Glencore Plc
1.29%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.23%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.20%
BP Plc
1.12%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.02%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.90%
Roche Holding AG
0.83%
Rio Tinto Plc
0.81%
Banco Santander SA
0.74%
Nestlé SA
0.68%
Mitsubishi Corp.
0.65%
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
0.65%
Frequently asked questions about IDHQ and FNDF
How have the IDHQ and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, IDHQ is up 23.83% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 16.99%. That puts IDHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IDHQ or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the IDHQ ETF saw +$206M in flows, compared to +$1.39B for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: IDHQ or FNDF?
Over the past year, IDHQ had a volatility of 19.6%, while FNDF experienced 14.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: IDHQ or FNDF?
As of July 17, 2026, IDHQ holds $909.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $24.22 B.
What sectors do the IDHQ and FNDF ETFs invest in?
IDHQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Finance, Technology and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IDHQ ETF and FNDF ETF?
IDHQ top holdings include SK hynix, Inc., ASML Holding NV and Novartis AG. FNDF holds in its top three: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Shell Plc and TotalEnergies SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: IDHQ or FNDF?
IDHQ holds 193 securities with 50.8% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 876 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.56%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
