IDHQvsDMXUETF Comparison
ETF 1
IDHQ
Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.43%
VS
ETF 2
DMXU
Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.43%
Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF (IDHQ) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF (DMXU) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. IDHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, DMXU's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. IDHQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.03% for DMXU. IDHQ is up 27.11% year-to-date (YTD) with +$455M in YTD flows. DMXU performs worse with 8.06% YTD performance, and -$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IDHQ and DMXU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IDHQ vs DMXU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IDHQ DMXU | +0.66%-2.26% | +2.26%-2.44% | +27.11%+8.06% | +30.39%+10.48% | +80.53%+55.22% | +62.46%+39.63% |
| Flows | IDHQ DMXU | +$113M-$6M | +$249M-$5M | +$455M-$7M | +$472M-$7M | +$733M-$859K | +$829M+$26M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IDHQ DMXU | +13.26%+9.88% | +19.71%+14.08% | +16.56%+14.36% | +16.83%+15.50% |
| Max drawdown | IDHQ DMXU | -6.77%-6.32% | -13.21%-11.19% | -15.06%-17.25% | -31.88%-30.95% |
| Max drawdown duration | IDHQ DMXU | 52d61d | 69d103d | 227d232d | 843d843d |
Trading data
IDHQ | DMXU | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.80 | |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $43.94 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IDHQ | DMXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IDHQ | DMXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.80 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.32% | – |
| AuM | $1.18 B | $60.06 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
IDHQ | DMXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | S&P Quality Developed ex US LargeMidCap Index | Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Core Markets Index |
| N° of holdings | 198 | 450 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2007 | September 6, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IDHQ
Switzerland
20.67%
Japan
15.26%
United Kingdom
11.01%
Germany
9.9%
France
7.89%
Netherlands
7.59%
Other
27.68%
DMXU
Japan
24.59%
United Kingdom
14.08%
France
11.59%
Switzerland
9.03%
Netherlands
8.69%
Other
32.02%
Sectors
IDHQ
Technology
21.76%
Industrials
18.05%
Healthcare
17.24%
Finance
16.01%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.47%
Other
17.48%
DMXU
Finance
27.17%
Technology
15.54%
Industrials
13.83%
Healthcare
9.85%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.48%
Other
17.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
IDHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.27%
DMXU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.82%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IDHQ
Roche Holding AG
4.91%
ASML Holding NV
4.56%
Novartis AG
4.27%
Nestlé SA
3.27%
SAP SE
2.84%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
2.76%
Advantest Corp.
2.44%
Allianz SE
2.38%
ABB Ltd.
2.34%
Safran SA
2.29%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.25%
Novo Nordisk A/S
2.09%
Sony Group Corp.
2.01%
Unilever Plc
1.98%
Siemens Energy AG
1.88%
DMXU
ASML Holding NV
5.76%
HSBC Holdings Plc
3.04%
Novartis AG
2.40%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.10%
Allianz SE
1.71%
Schneider Electric SE
1.64%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.61%
TotalEnergies SE
1.46%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.35%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.34%
ABB Ltd.
1.32%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.31%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.27%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.27%
Iberdrola SA
1.25%
Frequently asked questions about IDHQ and DMXU
How have the IDHQ and DMXU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IDHQ is up 27.11% year-to-date (YTD), while DMXU has returned 8.06%. That puts IDHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IDHQ or DMXU?
Year-to-date, the IDHQ ETF saw +$455M in flows, compared to -$7M for DMXU.
Which ETF is more volatile: IDHQ or DMXU?
Over the past year, IDHQ had a volatility of 19.71%, while DMXU experienced 14.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: IDHQ or DMXU?
As of October 16, 2026, IDHQ holds $1.18 B in assets under management (AUM), while DMXU manages $60.06 M.
What sectors do the IDHQ and DMXU ETFs invest in?
IDHQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, DMXU focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IDHQ ETF and DMXU ETF?
IDHQ top holdings include Roche Holding AG, ASML Holding NV and Novartis AG. DMXU holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: IDHQ or DMXU?
IDHQ holds 198 securities with 42.27% of its assets in the top 15. DMXU has 455 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.82%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
