IDEQvsACWXETF Comparison
VS
Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. IDEQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.32% for ACWX. IDEQ is up 17.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.15B in YTD flows. ACWX performs worse with 14.1% YTD performance, and +$3.15B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IDEQ and ACWX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IDEQ vs ACWX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IDEQ ACWX | -1.77%-2.98% | -0.44%-0.90% | +17.55%+14.10% | +26.79%+19.73% | n/a+69.45% | n/a+52.00% |
| Flows | IDEQ ACWX | +$113M+$202M | +$337M+$789M | +$1.15B+$3.15B | +$1.20B+$3.93B | -+$4.80B | -+$5.46B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IDEQ ACWX | +13.73%+15.78% | +15.77%+16.72% | n/a+14.81% | n/a+15.81% |
| Max drawdown | IDEQ ACWX | -6.06%-5.31% | -12.20%-11.33% | n/a-13.37% | n/a-29.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | IDEQ ACWX | 56d50d | 89d69d | n/a43d | n/a906d |
Trading data
IDEQ | ACWX | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $76.73 | |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $75.74 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IDEQ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIDEQ | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IDEQ | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $76.73 |
| 1D performance | – | +1.31% |
| AuM | $1.80 B | $12.21 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
IDEQ | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Lazard Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 245 | 1790 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 9, 2025 | March 26, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IDEQ
Japan
13.67%
United Kingdom
10.22%
Taiwan
8.63%
Canada
8.31%
France
7.22%
Republic of Korea
7.04%
Other
44.91%
ACWX
Japan
13.86%
United Kingdom
8.46%
Canada
8.29%
Taiwan
8.02%
Other
61.37%
Sectors
IDEQ
Finance
26.54%
Technology
22.76%
Industrials
14.2%
Healthcare
7.66%
Other
28.84%
ACWX
Finance
27.98%
Technology
20.51%
Industrials
12.14%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.31%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.28%
Other
24.79%
Advertisement
Diversification
IDEQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.43%
ACWX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.18%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IDEQ
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.99%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.03%
ASML Holding NV
2.88%
BNP Paribas SA
2.16%
VINCI SA
2.00%
Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.99%
Roche Holding AG
1.94%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.92%
GSK Plc
1.77%
Banco Santander SA
1.72%
NatWest Group Plc
1.57%
Barrick Mining Corp.
1.43%
Legal & General Group Plc
1.43%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
1.35%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
1.26%
ACWX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.61%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.85%
ASML Holding NV
1.77%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.40%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.02%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.00%
Roche Holding AG
0.84%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.81%
Novartis AG
0.79%
Nestlé SA
0.72%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.71%
Shell Plc
0.69%
Siemens AG
0.66%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.66%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.65%
Frequently asked questions about IDEQ and ACWX
How have the IDEQ and ACWX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, IDEQ is up 17.55% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWX has returned 14.1%. That puts IDEQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IDEQ or ACWX?
Year-to-date, the IDEQ ETF saw +$1.15B in flows, compared to +$3.15B for ACWX.
Which ETF is more volatile: IDEQ or ACWX?
Over the past year, IDEQ had a volatility of 15.77%, while ACWX experienced 16.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: IDEQ or ACWX?
As of September 16, 2026, IDEQ holds $1.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while ACWX manages $12.21 B.
What sectors do the IDEQ and ACWX ETFs invest in?
IDEQ leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWX focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IDEQ ETF and ACWX ETF?
IDEQ top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV. ACWX holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: IDEQ or ACWX?
IDEQ holds 246 securities with 31.43% of its assets in the top 15. ACWX has 1853 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.18%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
