New

Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →

Advertisement
ETF Central logo
Advertisement

ICOWvsUIVMETF Comparison

ETF 1
ICOW

Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF

This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-1.4%
Full ICOW fund page
VS
ETF 2
UIVM

VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF

This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
-1.8%
Full UIVM fund page

Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. ICOW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, UIVM's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. ICOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.39% for UIVM. ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$113M in YTD flows. UIVM performs worse with 6.27% YTD performance, and +$327K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOW and UIVM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

ICOW vs UIVM performance and flow charts

Performance

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Feb 12Feb 20Feb 27Mar 6

Cumulative Flows

0 M20 M40 M60 M80 MFeb 12Feb 20Feb 27Mar 6

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 03/12/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
ICOW
UIVM
-2.24%-5.20%
+7.96%+7.81%
+8.61%+6.27%
+36.85%+38.61%
+64.13%+84.85%
+61.97%+75.95%
Flows
ICOW
UIVM
+$78M+$4M
+$120M+$327K
+$113M+$327K
+$199M-$10M
+$828M-$83M
+$1.21B-$214M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
ICOW
UIVM
+14.01%+14.79%
+14.73%+14.20%
+13.46%+12.59%
+14.73%+13.64%
Max drawdown
ICOW
UIVM
-7.46%-8.64%
-14.38%-11.54%
-14.38%-11.54%
-28.38%-27.88%
Max drawdown duration
ICOW
UIVM
11d11d
54d35d
54d35d
765d764d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
ICOW
UIVM
Last sale
3/13/2026 at 7:16 PM
$41.68
$67.53
Previous close
03/12/2026
$41.83
$68.26
Consolidated volume
03/12/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of February 27, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
ICOW
UIVM
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 3/13/2026 at 7:16 PM
Live
Closed
ICOW
UIVM
Last price
$41.68
$67.53
1D performance
-0.36%
-1.07%
AuM$1.65 B$307.52 M
E/R0.65%0.39%
Characteristics
ICOW
UIVM
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderPACER ETFsVictoryShares
BenchmarkPacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 IndexNasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index
N° of holdings96186
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJune 16, 2017October 24, 2017
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

ICOW
Japan
18.45%
Republic of Korea
11.93%
France
11.29%
United Kingdom
9.89%
Germany
9.08%
Canada
8.74%
Other
30.62%
UIVM
Japan
18.18%
United Kingdom
10.78%
Republic of Korea
10.53%
Germany
7.76%
Canada
7.43%
Other
45.32%

Sectors

ICOW
Industrials
28.8%
Energy
18.95%
Consumer Discreti.
14.01%
Communication Ser.
8.67%
Consumer Staples
8.03%
Health Care
7.38%
Other
14.16%
UIVM
Financials
26.6%
Industrials
15.7%
Consumer Discreti.
8.65%
Other
49.05%
Advertisement

Diversification

ICOW

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

31.41%
UIVM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

13.75%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 31, 2026
ICOW
SUNCOR ENERGY
2.21%
MOELLER MAERSK
2.18%
PRYSMIAN
2.18%
HD HYUNDAI
2.17%
CK HUTCHISON HLDGS LTD
2.17%
VODAFONE GROUP
2.16%
KIA CORPORATION
2.15%
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL
2.15%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV SA/NV
2.11%
EQUINOR
2.09%
SUMITOMO
2.02%
TOTALENERGIES SE
2.01%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
1.97%
DEUTSCHE POST
1.92%
BP
1.92%
UIVM
CDN IMPERIAL BK
1.16%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.11%
BNS
1.10%
ORANGE
0.95%
POSTE ITALIANE
0.90%
KLEPIERRE REIT
0.90%
KONINKLIJKE AHOLD DELHAIZE NV
0.89%
INDUSTRIVARDEN SERIES
0.88%
YARA INTL
0.87%
POWER CORPORATION OF CANADA
0.87%
NN GROUP
0.84%
ITALGAS SPA
0.83%
SMITHS GROUP
0.82%
RWE ST
0.82%
INVESTOR
0.80%
Frequently asked questions about ICOW and UIVM

How have the ICOW and UIVM ETFs performed in 2026?

As of March 12, 2026, ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD), while UIVM has returned 6.27%. That puts ICOW better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOW or UIVM?

Year-to-date, the ICOW ETF saw +$113M in flows, compared to +$327K for UIVM.

Which ETF is more volatile: ICOW or UIVM?

Over the past year, ICOW had a volatility of 14.73%, while UIVM experienced 14.2%.

Which ETF is bigger: ICOW or UIVM?

As of March 12, 2026, ICOW holds $1.65 B in assets under management (AUM), while UIVM manages $307.52 M.

What sectors do the ICOW and UIVM ETFs invest in?

ICOW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, UIVM focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.

What are the top holdings of the ICOW ETF and UIVM ETF?

ICOW top holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, MOELLER MAERSK and PRYSMIAN. UIVM holds in its top three: CDN IMPERIAL BK, TORONTO DOMINION and BNS.

Which ETF is more diversified: ICOW or UIVM?

ICOW holds 97 securities with 31.41% of its assets in the top 15. UIVM has 189 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.75%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Webcast on Demand

Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution

Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.

Accepted for 1 CE Credit

Calamos Webcast