Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ICOWvsPXFETF Comparison
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. ICOW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, PXF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. ICOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.45% for PXF. ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$113M in YTD flows. PXF performs worse with 6.25% YTD performance, and +$147M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOW and PXF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ICOW vs PXF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICOW PXF | -2.24%-5.54% | +7.96%+8.29% | +8.61%+6.25% | +36.85%+37.38% | +64.13%+79.46% | +61.97%+79.58% |
| Flows | ICOW PXF | +$78M+$147M | +$120M+$147M | +$113M+$147M | +$199M+$98M | +$828M+$310M | +$1.21B+$581M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICOW PXF | +14.01%+15.51% | +14.73%+16.52% | +13.46%+13.85% | +14.73%+14.83% |
| Max drawdown | ICOW PXF | -7.46%-8.52% | -14.38%-13.75% | -14.38%-13.75% | -28.38%-26.68% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICOW PXF | 11d11d | 54d40d | 54d40d | 765d560d |
ICOW | PXF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.62 | $69.03 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.83 | $69.69 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ICOW | PXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ICOW | PXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.62 | $69.03 |
| 1D performance | -0.50% | -0.95% |
| AuM | $1.65 B | $2.57 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.45% |
ICOW | PXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index | RAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex-US 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 946 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 16, 2017 | June 25, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ICOW and PXF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD), while PXF has returned 6.25%. That puts ICOW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOW or PXF?
Year-to-date, the ICOW ETF saw +$113M in flows, compared to +$147M for PXF.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICOW or PXF?
Over the past year, ICOW had a volatility of 14.73%, while PXF experienced 16.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICOW or PXF?
As of March 12, 2026, ICOW holds $1.65 B in assets under management (AUM), while PXF manages $2.57 B.
What sectors do the ICOW and PXF ETFs invest in?
ICOW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, PXF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ICOW ETF and PXF ETF?
ICOW top holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, MOELLER MAERSK and PRYSMIAN. PXF holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICOW or PXF?
ICOW holds 97 securities with 31.41% of its assets in the top 15. PXF has 996 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.87%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
