Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ICOWvsIFLOETF Comparison
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. ICOW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IFLO's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Materials. ICOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 1.05% for IFLO. ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$113M in YTD flows. IFLO performs worse with 7.25% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOW and IFLO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ICOW vs IFLO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICOW IFLO | -2.24%-0.64% | +7.96%+7.67% | +8.61%+7.25% | +36.85%n/a | +64.13%n/a | +61.97%n/a |
| Flows | ICOW IFLO | +$78M+$41M | +$120M+$40M | +$113M+$41M | +$199M- | +$828M- | +$1.21B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICOW IFLO | +14.01%+11.97% | +14.73%n/a | +13.46%n/a | +14.73%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ICOW IFLO | -7.46%-4.47% | -14.38%n/a | -14.38%n/a | -28.38%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ICOW IFLO | 11d11d | 54dn/a | 54dn/a | 765dn/a |
ICOW | IFLO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 7:21 PM | $41.63 | $30.27 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.83 | $30.49 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ICOW | IFLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ICOW | IFLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.63 | $30.27 |
| 1D performance | -0.48% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $1.65 B | $155.28 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 1.05% |
ICOW | IFLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index | Victory International Free Cash Flow Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 96 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 16, 2017 | June 24, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ICOW and IFLO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD), while IFLO has returned 7.25%. That puts ICOW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOW or IFLO?
Year-to-date, the ICOW ETF saw +$113M in flows, compared to +$41M for IFLO.
Which ETF is bigger: ICOW or IFLO?
As of March 12, 2026, ICOW holds $1.65 B in assets under management (AUM), while IFLO manages $155.28 M.
What sectors do the ICOW and IFLO ETFs invest in?
ICOW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IFLO focuses on Energy, Industrials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the ICOW ETF and IFLO ETF?
ICOW top holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, MOELLER MAERSK and PRYSMIAN. IFLO holds in its top three: SHELL PLC, EQUINOR and DENSO.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICOW or IFLO?
ICOW holds 97 securities with 31.41% of its assets in the top 15. IFLO has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.45%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
