Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ICOWvsFNDFETF Comparison
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. ICOW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. ICOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$113M in YTD flows. FNDF performs worse with 7.55% YTD performance, and +$581M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOW and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ICOW vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICOW FNDF | -2.24%-5.01% | +7.96%+9.25% | +8.61%+7.55% | +36.85%+38.73% | +64.13%+78.01% | +61.97%+79.59% |
| Flows | ICOW FNDF | +$78M+$384M | +$120M+$1.13B | +$113M+$581M | +$199M+$2.05B | +$828M+$5.07B | +$1.21B+$8.74B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICOW FNDF | +14.01%+16.20% | +14.73%+15.58% | +13.46%+13.58% | +14.73%+14.47% |
| Max drawdown | ICOW FNDF | -7.46%-9.15% | -14.38%-13.78% | -14.38%-13.78% | -28.38%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICOW FNDF | 11d11d | 54d44d | 54d44d | 765d545d |
ICOW | FNDF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 7:16 PM | $41.68 | $48.06 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.83 | $48.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ICOW | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ICOW | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.68 | $48.06 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.74% |
| AuM | $1.65 B | $21.64 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.25% |
ICOW | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 821 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 16, 2017 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ICOW and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 7.55%. That puts ICOW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOW or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the ICOW ETF saw +$113M in flows, compared to +$581M for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICOW or FNDF?
Over the past year, ICOW had a volatility of 14.73%, while FNDF experienced 15.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICOW or FNDF?
As of March 12, 2026, ICOW holds $1.65 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $21.64 B.
What sectors do the ICOW and FNDF ETFs invest in?
ICOW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ICOW ETF and FNDF ETF?
ICOW top holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, MOELLER MAERSK and PRYSMIAN. FNDF holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICOW or FNDF?
ICOW holds 97 securities with 31.41% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 865 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.13%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
