ICOWvsFNDFETF Comparison
ETF 1
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.28%
VS
ETF 2
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.28%
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. ICOW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. ICOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. ICOW is up 14.31% year-to-date (YTD) with +$192M in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 20.25% YTD performance, and +$1.65B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOW and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICOW vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICOW FNDF | +3.60%+1.76% | +0.39%+5.71% | +14.31%+20.25% | +32.24%+39.67% | +60.09%+85.34% | +62.53%+93.23% |
| Flows | ICOW FNDF | -$7M+$352M | +$31M+$867M | +$192M+$1.65B | +$288M+$2.63B | +$615M+$5.51B | +$1.27B+$9.23B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICOW FNDF | +12.77%+15.08% | +12.34%+14.30% | +13.23%+14.09% | +14.86%+14.78% |
| Max drawdown | ICOW FNDF | -8.89%-4.43% | -8.89%-10.49% | -14.38%-13.78% | -27.94%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICOW FNDF | 63d61d | 63d65d | 54d44d | 545d545d |
Trading data
ICOW | FNDF | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.07 | $54.68 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $43.91 | $54.10 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICOW | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICOW | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.07 | $54.68 |
| 1D performance | +0.35% | +1.07% |
| AuM | $1.81 B | $25.16 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
ICOW | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 856 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 16, 2017 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICOW
Japan
21.88%
France
14.13%
Canada
11.89%
United Kingdom
11.8%
Germany
7.11%
Other
33.19%
FNDF
Japan
22.6%
United Kingdom
13.15%
Republic of Korea
9.99%
Canada
8.69%
France
8.2%
Germany
7.72%
Other
29.64%
Sectors
ICOW
Industrials
20.14%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.48%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.86%
Energy
11.7%
Telecommunication.
8.63%
Technology
8.18%
Other
23.01%
FNDF
Finance
19.41%
Technology
13.33%
Industrials
11.37%
Energy
11.34%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.81%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.33%
Other
24.4%
Diversification
ICOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.72%
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.31%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ICOW
VINCI SA
2.13%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
2.10%
KDDI Corp.
2.09%
Deutsche Post AG
2.04%
CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd.
2.03%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.00%
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV
2.00%
Barrick Mining Corp.
1.97%
Sanofi
1.96%
Vodafone Group Plc
1.95%
Deutsche Telekom AG
1.93%
International Consolidated Airlines Group SA
1.93%
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain SA
1.92%
Sony Group Corp.
1.84%
Shell Plc
1.83%
FNDF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.74%
Shell Plc
2.20%
TotalEnergies SE
1.62%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.14%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.09%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.07%
Glencore Plc
1.02%
BP Plc
1.01%
Roche Holding AG
0.88%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.85%
Banco Santander SA
0.82%
Nestlé SA
0.80%
Rio Tinto Plc
0.71%
Deutsche Telekom AG
0.69%
Novartis AG
0.67%
Frequently asked questions about ICOW and FNDF
How have the ICOW and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, ICOW is up 14.31% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 20.25%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOW or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the ICOW ETF saw +$192M in flows, compared to +$1.65B for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICOW or FNDF?
Over the past year, ICOW had a volatility of 12.34%, while FNDF experienced 14.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICOW or FNDF?
As of August 3, 2026, ICOW holds $1.81 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $25.16 B.
What sectors do the ICOW and FNDF ETFs invest in?
ICOW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ICOW ETF and FNDF ETF?
ICOW top holdings include VINCI SA, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and KDDI Corp.. FNDF holds in its top three: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Shell Plc and TotalEnergies SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICOW or FNDF?
ICOW holds 97 securities with 29.72% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 877 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.31%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
