ICOWvsFNDFETF Comparison
ETF 1
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.21%
VS
ETF 2
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.21%
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. ICOW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Energy. ICOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. ICOW is up 11.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$200M in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 19.19% YTD performance, and +$1.39B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOW and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICOW vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICOW FNDF | -3.95%+2.48% | +1.09%+9.37% | +11.12%+19.19% | +29.59%+41.79% | +59.84%+85.14% | +59.11%+92.37% |
| Flows | ICOW FNDF | +$23M+$460M | +$87M+$809M | +$200M+$1.39B | +$312M+$2.46B | +$678M+$5.46B | +$1.28B+$8.98B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICOW FNDF | +13.84%+17.59% | +12.28%+14.00% | +13.38%+14.05% | +14.85%+14.75% |
| Max drawdown | ICOW FNDF | -5.54%-4.32% | -8.38%-10.49% | -14.38%-13.78% | -27.94%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICOW FNDF | 17d15d | 65d65d | 54d44d | 545d545d |
Trading data
ICOW | FNDF | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.86 | $54.12 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $43.19 | $53.86 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICOW | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICOW | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.86 | $54.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.75% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $1.77 B | $24.80 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
ICOW | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 825 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 16, 2017 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICOW
Japan
17.39%
Republic of Korea
12.24%
France
11.4%
United Kingdom
9.94%
Canada
9.44%
Germany
8.1%
Other
31.49%
FNDF
Japan
22.42%
United Kingdom
13.72%
Republic of Korea
9.6%
Canada
8.73%
France
8.17%
Germany
7.56%
Other
29.81%
Sectors
ICOW
Industrials
28.02%
Energy
21.81%
Consumer Discreti.
12.54%
Consumer Staples
8.11%
Communication Ser.
7.89%
Health Care
7.06%
Other
14.57%
FNDF
Financials
16.46%
Industrials
14.64%
Energy
11.78%
Materials
10.87%
Consumer Discreti.
10.85%
Information Techn.
10.02%
Other
25.39%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.72%
FNDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.63%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
ICOW
EQUINOR
2.88%
PRYSMIAN
2.58%
SUNCOR ENERGY
2.56%
TOTALENERGIES SE
2.41%
HD HYUNDAI
2.39%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.29%
BP
2.25%
VODAFONE GROUP
2.19%
SHELL PLC
2.10%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV SA/NV
2.09%
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL
2.02%
CK HUTCHISON HLDGS LTD
2.01%
KIA CORPORATION
2.01%
KONINKLIJKE AHOLD DELHAIZE NV
1.98%
MOELLER MAERSK
1.96%
FNDF
SAMSUNG ELECTR
4.20%
SHELL PLC
2.52%
TOTALENERGIES SE
1.88%
GLENCORE PLC
1.31%
BP
1.29%
BHP GROUP LTD
1.18%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.03%
TOYOTA
0.97%
CH1499059983
0.86%
RIO TINTO
0.81%
SK HYNIX
0.77%
BANCO SANTANDER SA
0.75%
NESTLE SA
0.74%
MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG
0.67%
MITSUBISHI
0.66%
Frequently asked questions about ICOW and FNDF
How have the ICOW and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, ICOW is up 11.12% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 19.19%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOW or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the ICOW ETF saw +$200M in flows, compared to +$1.39B for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICOW or FNDF?
Over the past year, ICOW had a volatility of 12.28%, while FNDF experienced 14%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICOW or FNDF?
As of June 18, 2026, ICOW holds $1.77 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $24.80 B.
What sectors do the ICOW and FNDF ETFs invest in?
ICOW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the ICOW ETF and FNDF ETF?
ICOW top holdings include EQUINOR, PRYSMIAN and SUNCOR ENERGY. FNDF holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICOW or FNDF?
ICOW holds 97 securities with 33.72% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 874 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.63%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
