Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ICOWvsFIVAETF Comparison
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. ICOW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FIVA's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. ICOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.19% for FIVA. ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$113M in YTD flows. FIVA performs worse with 2.83% YTD performance, and +$156M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOW and FIVA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ICOW vs FIVA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICOW FIVA | -2.24%-6.70% | +7.96%+5.06% | +8.61%+2.83% | +36.85%+34.35% | +64.13%+75.72% | +61.97%+77.55% |
| Flows | ICOW FIVA | +$78M+$38M | +$120M+$173M | +$113M+$156M | +$199M+$242M | +$828M+$376M | +$1.21B+$400M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICOW FIVA | +14.01%+14.60% | +14.73%+15.72% | +13.46%+13.65% | +14.73%+14.83% |
| Max drawdown | ICOW FIVA | -7.46%-8.21% | -14.38%-14.35% | -14.38%-14.35% | -28.38%-28.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICOW FIVA | 11d11d | 54d44d | 54d44d | 765d560d |
ICOW | FIVA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 7:16 PM | $41.68 | $34.78 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.83 | $35.03 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ICOW | FIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ICOW | FIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.68 | $34.78 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $1.65 B | $509.87 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.19% |
ICOW | FIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index | Fidelity International Value Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 104 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 16, 2017 | January 16, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ICOW and FIVA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, ICOW is up 8.61% year-to-date (YTD), while FIVA has returned 2.83%. That puts ICOW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOW or FIVA?
Year-to-date, the ICOW ETF saw +$113M in flows, compared to +$156M for FIVA.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICOW or FIVA?
Over the past year, ICOW had a volatility of 14.73%, while FIVA experienced 15.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICOW or FIVA?
As of March 12, 2026, ICOW holds $1.65 B in assets under management (AUM), while FIVA manages $509.87 M.
What sectors do the ICOW and FIVA ETFs invest in?
ICOW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FIVA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the ICOW ETF and FIVA ETF?
ICOW top holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, MOELLER MAERSK and PRYSMIAN. FIVA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, CA06849F1080 and FRESNILLO PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICOW or FIVA?
ICOW holds 97 securities with 31.41% of its assets in the top 15. FIVA has 107 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.42%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
