IBOTvsHUMNETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) belong to the same industry segment: Robotics & Automation. IBOT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Energy. In contrast, HUMN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Cyclicals and Technology. IBOT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.75% for HUMN. IBOT is up 20.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$54M in YTD flows. HUMN performs worse with -0.94% YTD performance, and +$52M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBOT and HUMN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBOT vs HUMN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBOT HUMN | -3.23%-12.20% | +3.53%-9.00% | +20.88%-0.94% | +33.82%+14.45% | +70.66%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | IBOT HUMN | +$8M+$10M | +$25M+$32M | +$54M+$52M | +$65M+$77M | +$79M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBOT HUMN | +30.18%+41.61% | +24.76%+29.81% | +23.28%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IBOT HUMN | -8.93%-23.49% | -16.61%-23.49% | -25.45%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBOT HUMN | 32d52d | 57d52d | 345dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
IBOT | HUMN | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 4:05 PM | $62.89 | $29.42 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $63.42 | $29.49 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
HUMN
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIBOT | HUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 4:05 PM
Live
Closed
IBOT | HUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.89 | $29.42 |
| 1D performance | -0.85% | -0.25% |
| AuM | $93.58 M | $79.07 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
IBOT | HUMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | VanEck | Roundhill Investments |
| Benchmark | BlueStar Robotics Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 62 | 39 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 5, 2023 | June 26, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBOT
USA
43.99%
Japan
24.64%
Switzerland
8.23%
Other
23.14%
HUMN
USA
22.8%
China
21.73%
Japan
15.24%
Republic of Korea
10.76%
Other
29.47%
Sectors
IBOT
Industrials
61.84%
Technology
33.25%
Other
4.91%
HUMN
Industrials
45.21%
Consumer Cyclical.
20.42%
Technology
20.2%
Other
14.17%
Diversification
IBOT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.53%
HUMN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.08%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
IBOT
KEYENCE Corp.
5.92%
ASML Holding NV
5.22%
ABB Ltd.
5.17%
Emerson Electric Co.
5.00%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.68%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
3.90%
Autodesk, Inc.
3.26%
FANUC Corp.
2.95%
Teledyne Technologies, Inc.
2.36%
TechnipFMC plc
2.14%
Daifuku Co., Ltd.
2.13%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.09%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.96%
Lam Research Corp.
1.91%
YASKAWA Electric Corp.
1.84%
HUMN
Tesla, Inc.
5.29%
UBTECH Robotics Corp. Ltd.
5.14%
Harmonic Drive Systems, Inc.
4.53%
Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co., Ltd.
4.05%
Hyundai Motor Co.
4.02%
Teradyne, Inc.
3.92%
ROBOTIS Co., Ltd.
3.41%
Doosan Robotics, Inc.
3.33%
Hexagon AB
2.88%
ABB Ltd.
2.84%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.79%
Nabtesco Corp.
2.70%
Infineon Technologies AG
2.44%
China Leadshine Technology Co., Ltd.
2.44%
Minth Group Ltd.
2.30%
Frequently asked questions about IBOT and HUMN
How have the IBOT and HUMN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, IBOT is up 20.88% year-to-date (YTD), while HUMN has lost -0.94%. That puts IBOT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBOT or HUMN?
Year-to-date, the IBOT ETF saw +$54M in flows, compared to +$52M for HUMN.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBOT or HUMN?
Over the past year, IBOT had a volatility of 24.76%, while HUMN experienced 29.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBOT or HUMN?
As of July 24, 2026, IBOT holds $93.58 M in assets under management (AUM), while HUMN manages $79.07 M.
What sectors do the IBOT and HUMN ETFs invest in?
IBOT leans toward sectors like Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, HUMN focuses on Industrials, Consumer Cyclicals and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IBOT ETF and HUMN ETF?
IBOT top holdings include KEYENCE Corp., ASML Holding NV and ABB Ltd.. HUMN holds in its top three: Tesla, Inc., UBTECH Robotics Corp. Ltd. and Harmonic Drive Systems, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IBOT or HUMN?
IBOT holds 62 securities with 50.53% of its assets in the top 15. HUMN has 39 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.08%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
