IBMSvsDFCAETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMS) and Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. IBMS's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, DFCA's top sector exposures are Municipal. IBMS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.19% for DFCA. IBMS is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$144M in YTD flows. DFCA performs worse with -1.42% YTD performance, and -$53M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMS and DFCA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMS vs DFCA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMS DFCA | +0.22%-0.17% | -1.08%-2.41% | -0.77%-1.42% | -0.27%-0.68% | n/a+7.64% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IBMS DFCA | +$19M-$180M | +$56M-$157M | +$144M-$53M | +$218M+$6M | -+$368M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMS DFCA | +3.25%+3.74% | +2.09%+2.24% | n/a+2.42% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IBMS DFCA | -3.36%-4.38% | -4.36%-4.89% | n/a-4.89% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMS DFCA | 67d92d | 235d229d | n/a229d | n/an/a |
Trading data
IBMS | DFCA | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.36 | $48.27 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $25.36 | $48.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DFCA
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIBMS | DFCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBMS | DFCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.36 | $48.27 |
| 1D performance | -0.02% | -0.23% |
| AuM | $363.11 M | $522.41 M |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
IBMS | DFCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Dimensional |
| Benchmark | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2030 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 491 | 130 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 22, 2024 | June 27, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBMS
USA
33.92%
Other
66.08%
DFCA
USA
36.89%
Other
63.11%
Sectors
IBMS
Municipal
32.72%
Other
67.28%
DFCA
Municipal
36.89%
Other
63.11%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBMS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.34%
DFCA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.19%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IBMS
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
1.20%
New Jersey, 4% 1jun2030, USD
0.74%
US79625GNF62
0.59%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 15nov2045, USD (2015A-2)
0.54%
US91412HWB58
0.49%
Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1jul2064, USD (2025B-1)
0.47%
California, 5% 1nov2030, USD
0.42%
US544647MT41
0.40%
US03843TAY73
0.40%
US544647HM52
0.38%
US618024BT98
0.36%
Alabama Public School and College Authority, 5% 1nov2032, USD (2020-A)
0.36%
US419794B842
0.35%
Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission, 5% 1may2030, USD (2022)
0.32%
US39081HHV78
0.32%
DFCA
US072024YF30
2.25%
US544657JD25
1.84%
California, 5% 1apr2035, USD
1.53%
US769110DA28
1.32%
US797661G257
1.04%
City of Los Angeles, 5% 24jun2027, USD (2026)
0.96%
US544647HM52
0.91%
US797661D510
0.90%
California, 5% 1oct2042, USD
0.88%
California, 5% 1oct2029, USD
0.79%
US013079R2J7
0.77%
California, 5% 1mar2038, USD
0.77%
US797661F424
0.76%
California, 4% 1nov2036, USD
0.74%
US13077DYZ94
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about IBMS and DFCA
How have the IBMS and DFCA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, IBMS is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while DFCA has lost -1.42%. That puts IBMS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMS or DFCA?
Year-to-date, the IBMS ETF saw +$144M in flows, compared to -$53M for DFCA.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMS or DFCA?
Over the past year, IBMS had a volatility of 2.09%, while DFCA experienced 2.24%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMS or DFCA?
As of October 19, 2026, IBMS holds $363.11 M in assets under management (AUM), while DFCA manages $522.41 M.
What sectors do the IBMS and DFCA ETFs invest in?
IBMS leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, DFCA focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the IBMS ETF and DFCA ETF?
IBMS top holdings include BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash, New Jersey, 4% 1jun2030, USD and US79625GNF62. DFCA holds in its top three: US072024YF30, US544657JD25 and California, 5% 1apr2035, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMS or DFCA?
IBMS holds 1769 securities with 7.34% of its assets in the top 15. DFCA has 490 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.19%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
