IBMRvsVTESETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTES) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. IBMR's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, VTES's top sector exposures are Municipal. IBMR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.05% for VTES. IBMR is up 0.09% year-to-date (YTD) with +$139M in YTD flows. VTES performs worse with 0.05% YTD performance, and +$2.52B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMR and VTES below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMR vs VTES performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMR VTES | -0.03%+0.15% | -0.73%-0.72% | +0.09%+0.05% | +0.54%+0.53% | +12.70%+9.70% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IBMR VTES | +$22M+$1.06B | +$50M+$1.95B | +$139M+$2.52B | +$213M+$2.69B | +$506M+$3.87B | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMR VTES | +2.33%+2.60% | +1.50%+1.59% | +2.41%+1.59% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IBMR VTES | -2.47%-2.66% | -2.75%-2.95% | -2.98%-2.95% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMR VTES | 52d64d | 232d232d | 212d232d | n/an/a |
Trading data
IBMR | VTES | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.96 | $99.59 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $24.93 | $99.50 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBMR | VTES | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBMR | VTES | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.96 | $99.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.12% | +0.09% |
| AuM | $507.40 M | $4.08 B |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.05% |
Characteristics
IBMR | VTES | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2029 Index | S&P 0-7 Year National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | 820 | 1671 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 9, 2023 | March 9, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBMR
USA
51.44%
Other
48.56%
VTES
USA
52.32%
Other
47.68%
Sectors
IBMR
Municipal
50.4%
Other
49.6%
VTES
Municipal
52.32%
Other
47.68%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBMR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.71%
VTES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.61%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IBMR
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
1.04%
US13034A5B23
0.74%
US575829PH38
0.55%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2029, USD
0.52%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2026)
0.45%
New York Dormitory Authority, 2.5% 1jul1993, USD
0.39%
Houston, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2018B)
0.38%
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2017-A)
0.38%
California, 5% 1oct2029, USD
0.34%
Palm Beach School Board, 5% 1aug2029, USD (2018C)
0.34%
US18085PTF17
0.33%
Pennsylvania, 5% 1apr2029, USD (2026)
0.33%
California, 5% 1sep2029, USD
0.33%
US13063EUP95
0.31%
Contra Costa Transportation Authority, 5% 1mar2029, USD (2018B)
0.29%
VTES
US13063EUN48
0.91%
US13063EUM64
0.86%
US13063EUP95
0.78%
US13063EUU80
0.42%
North Colonie Central School District, 3.75% 25jun2027, USD (2026)
0.40%
US13063EUQ78
0.38%
US13063EUS35
0.30%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2028, USD (2017D)
0.22%
US64972JQM35
0.21%
US13063ENN21
0.19%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.19%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2032, USD (2024)
0.19%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2029, USD
0.19%
Pennsylvania Public School Building Authority, 5% 1jun2033, USD (2016A)
0.18%
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 15jun2042, USD
0.18%
Frequently asked questions about IBMR and VTES
How have the IBMR and VTES ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMR is up 0.09% year-to-date (YTD), while VTES has returned 0.05%. That puts IBMR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMR or VTES?
Year-to-date, the IBMR ETF saw +$139M in flows, compared to +$2.52B for VTES.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMR or VTES?
Over the past year, IBMR had a volatility of 1.5%, while VTES experienced 1.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMR or VTES?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMR holds $507.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while VTES manages $4.08 B.
What sectors do the IBMR and VTES ETFs invest in?
IBMR leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, VTES focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the IBMR ETF and VTES ETF?
IBMR top holdings include BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash, US13034A5B23 and US575829PH38. VTES holds in its top three: US13063EUN48, US13063EUM64 and US13063EUP95.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMR or VTES?
IBMR holds 1822 securities with 6.71% of its assets in the top 15. VTES has 3442 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.61%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBMR & VTES
Advertisement
