IBMRvsIBMPETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 2 sector exposures: Municipal and Non-Corporate. Both IBMR and IBMP have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%. IBMR is up 0.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$108M in YTD flows. IBMP performs better with 1.55% YTD performance, and +$65M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMR and IBMP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMR vs IBMP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMR IBMP | +0.17%+0.22% | +0.12%+0.60% | +0.75%+1.55% | +1.61%+2.12% | +10.92%+9.67% | n/a+3.11% |
| Flows | IBMR IBMP | +$14M+$8M | +$33M+$20M | +$108M+$65M | +$197M+$103M | +$477M+$380M | -+$605M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMR IBMP | +1.06%+0.35% | +1.17%+0.47% | +2.46%+1.34% | n/a+1.95% |
| Max drawdown | IBMR IBMP | -0.69%-0.10% | -1.37%-0.42% | -3.04%-1.67% | n/a-9.68% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMR IBMP | 49d20d | 187d90d | 70d63d | n/a1375d |
Trading data
IBMR | IBMP | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.19 | $25.33 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $25.18 | $25.33 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBMR | IBMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBMR | IBMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.19 | $25.33 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $480.42 M | $661.99 M |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.1% |
Characteristics
IBMR | IBMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2029 Index | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2027 Index |
| N° of holdings | 820 | 693 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 9, 2023 | August 9, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBMR
USA
51.62%
Other
48.38%
IBMP
USA
51.41%
Other
48.59%
Sectors
IBMR
Municipal
51.36%
Other
48.64%
IBMP
Municipal
51.06%
Other
48.94%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBMR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.13%
IBMP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.18%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IBMR
US13034A5B23
0.77%
US575829PH38
0.58%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2029, USD
0.53%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2026)
0.46%
New York Dormitory Authority, 2.5% 1jul1993, USD
0.40%
Houston, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2018B)
0.40%
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2017-A)
0.39%
Palm Beach School Board, 5% 1aug2029, USD (2018C)
0.36%
California, 5% 1oct2029, USD
0.35%
Pennsylvania, 5% 1apr2029, USD (2026)
0.34%
California, 5% 1sep2029, USD
0.34%
US18085PTF17
0.33%
US64972JVQ83
0.30%
Contra Costa Transportation Authority, 5% 1mar2029, USD (2018B)
0.30%
Escondido Union High School District, 0% 1aug2029, USD (2017D)
0.29%
IBMP
Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016)
0.45%
California, 5% 1apr2027, USD
0.44%
US91412HTM50
0.39%
US80585TCQ22
0.37%
Geisinger Authority Health System, 5% 1apr2043, USD (2021A)
0.36%
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
0.35%
US09182NCB47
0.34%
El Camino Community College District, 0% 1aug2027, USD (2012C)
0.33%
US100853UQ10
0.33%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2027, USD
0.32%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2027, USD (2011A)
0.32%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017A)
0.31%
District of Columbia, 5% 1oct2027, USD (2019C)
0.29%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.28%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2027, USD (2021C-2)
0.28%
Frequently asked questions about IBMR and IBMP
How have the IBMR and IBMP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, IBMR is up 0.75% year-to-date (YTD), while IBMP has returned 1.55%. That puts IBMP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMR or IBMP?
Year-to-date, the IBMR ETF saw +$108M in flows, compared to +$65M for IBMP.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMR or IBMP?
Over the past year, IBMR had a volatility of 1.17%, while IBMP experienced 0.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMR or IBMP?
As of September 1, 2026, IBMR holds $480.42 M in assets under management (AUM), while IBMP manages $661.99 M.
What sectors do the IBMR and IBMP ETFs invest in?
IBMR leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, IBMP focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the IBMR ETF and IBMP ETF?
IBMR top holdings include US13034A5B23, US575829PH38 and New Jersey, 5% 1jun2029, USD. IBMP holds in its top three: Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016), California, 5% 1apr2027, USD and US91412HTM50.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMR or IBMP?
IBMR holds 1800 securities with 6.13% of its assets in the top 15. IBMP has 1833 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.18%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
